Privatization, Business Attraction, and Social Services across the United States

作者: Linda Lobao , Lazarus Adua , Gregory Hooks

DOI: 10.1525/SP.2014.12180

关键词: Social workState (polity)Business sectorEconomic systemContext (language use)Public sectorWelfare stateIncentiveSocial WelfarePolitical economyEconomics

摘要: Privatization, business attraction incentives, and limited social service provision are market-oriented policies that broadly concern scientists. These conventionally assumed to be widely implemented across the United States, a world model of neoliberal development. This study takes new look at these policies, providing first view how they unfold nation geographic scale drills down local state. We document extent which localities privatized their public services, used attraction, delivery in last decade. Extending national-level theories welfare state, we focus on two sets factors explain where most likely utilized. The first, derived from class-politics approach, emphasizes class interests such as unions political-ideological context, anticipates utilized Republican leaning, pro-business, distressed contexts. second, political-institutional state capacity path dependency determinants. analyses based over 1,700 localities, majority county governments, using unique policy data. Class-politics variables have modest relationship show sector influence matter. findings strongly support importance dependency. Overall our challenges assumptions acquiescence is widespread. Rather, find evidence resilience among communities States.

参考文章(84)
Olle Törnquist, Peter Mayers, Politics and development : a critical introduction SAGE. ,(1999)
Sanford Schram, Samuel Hutchison Beer, Welfare reform : a race to the bottom? Woodrow Wilson Center Press , Distributed by Johns Hopkins University Press. ,(1999)
Laura A. Reese, Raymond A. Rosenfeld, The Civic Culture of Local Economic Development ,(2001)
Marc Allen Eisner, Jeff Worsham, Evan J. Ringquist, Contemporary Regulatory Policy ,(1999)
Daniel Béland, NEO-LIBERALISM AND SOCIAL POLICY Policy Studies. ,vol. 28, pp. 91- 107 ,(2007) , 10.1080/01442870701309023