Societal Sentience: Constructions of the Public in Animal Research Policy and Practice.
作者： Pru Hobson-West , Ashley Davies
关键词: Sociology 、 Situated 、 Certification 、 The Imaginary 、 Field (Bourdieu) 、 Epistemology 、 Context (language use) 、 Sentience 、 Environmental ethics 、 Ethnography 、 Sociology of scientific knowledge
摘要: The use of nonhuman animals as models in research and drug testing is a key route through which contemporary scientific knowledge certified. Given ethical concerns, regulation animal promotes the less "sentient" animals. This paper draws on documentary analysis legal documents qualitative interviews with Named Veterinary Surgeons others at commercial laboratory UK. Its claim that concept sentience entangled particular imaginary how general public or wider society views We call this societal sentience. Against backdrop increasing ethnographic work care encounters laboratory, helps to stress context within such take place. conclude has potential purchase beyond field, helping highlight affective dimension imaginaries their consequences. Researching critiquing sentience, we argue, may ultimately have more impact fate humans nonhumans than focusing wholly ethics situated practice.
sagepub.com
sci-hub.se 参考文章(50)
Ian Welsh, Brian Wynne, Science, scientism and imaginaries of publics in the UK: passive objects, incipient threats Science As Culture. ,vol. 22, pp. 540- 566 ,(2013) , 10.1080/14636778.2013.764072
Michael E. Lynch, Sacrifice and the Transformation of the Animal Body into a Scientific Object: Laboratory Culture and Ritual Practice in the Neurosciences: Social Studies of Science. ,vol. 18, pp. 265- 289 ,(1988) , 10.1177/030631288018002004
Graham P. Martin, ‘Ordinary people only’: knowledge, representativeness, and the publics of public participation in healthcare Sociology of Health & Illness. ,vol. 30, pp. 35- 54 ,(2008) , 10.1111/J.1467-9566.2007.01027.X
Pru Hobson-West, Three Authors Investigate Relationships between Nonhuman Animals, Humans, and Science The Sacrifice: How Scientific Experiments Transform Animals and People Society & Animals. ,vol. 16, pp. 102- 104 ,(2008) , 10.1163/156853008X269944
David Delaney, Making Nature/Marking Humans: Law as a Site of (Cultural) Production Annals of The Association of American Geographers. ,vol. 91, pp. 487- 503 ,(2001) , 10.1111/0004-5608.00255
Pru Hobson-West, Stephen Timmons, Animals and anomalies: an analysis of the UK veterinary profession and the relative lack of state reform The Sociological Review. ,vol. 64, pp. 47- 63 ,(2016) , 10.1111/1467-954X.12254
Beth Greenhough, Emma Roe, Ethics, space, and somatic sensibilities: comparing relationships between scientific researchers and their human and animal experimental subjects Environment and Planning D-society & Space. ,vol. 29, pp. 47- 66 ,(2011) , 10.1068/D17109
Martyn Pickersgill, The Co-production of Science, Ethics, and Emotion Science, Technology, & Human Values. ,vol. 37, pp. 579- 603 ,(2012) , 10.1177/0162243911433057
S. EBEN KIRKSEY, STEFAN HELMREICH, THE EMERGENCE OF MULTISPECIES ETHNOGRAPHY Cultural Anthropology. ,vol. 25, pp. 545- 576 ,(2010) , 10.1111/J.1548-1360.2010.01069.X
Gail Davies, The Sacred and the Profane: Biotechnology, Rationality, and Public Debate: Environment and Planning A. ,vol. 38, pp. 423- 443 ,(2006) , 10.1068/A37387