Optimization of urea SCR deNOx systems for HD diesel engines

作者: Rinie van Helden , Ruud Verbeek , Frank Willems , Reinier van der Welle

DOI: 10.4271/2004-01-0154

关键词: UreaCalibrationDiesel fuelEnvironmental scienceTest benchAutomotive engineeringMixing (process engineering)Exhaust gasSystem modelNOx

摘要: In the past decade, SCR deNOx technology with urea injection has grown to maturity. European OEMs will apply meet future heavy-duty emissions legislation starting EURO-4 (2005/2006). Numerous research programs in Europe and US have shown a variety of system layouts control strategies. The main differences are formed by: engine-out NOx calibration; application an NO NO2 catalyst; open-loop or closed-loop dosage control. This paper gives overview possible configurations that required for different stages emission legislation. Engine-out is strongly influenced by ambient conditions. Projections this study show combination cold climate wintergrade fuel most severe: it may lead 30% lower respect laboratory varying requires safety margin case open-loop-controlled order avoid excessive NH3 slip. Calculations Euro 4 limits can be met dosage; catalyst not even required. For other (Euro 5, 2007 2010), becomes difficult safely achieve 2010 require because low average load consequently exhaust gas temperatures. Engines developed need special measures increase temperature reduce below 2 g/kWh. all cases, optimal hydrolysis mixing conditions major importance. High-speed photography droplet size measurements presented as methods characterizing modelling aqueous spray patterns. information from these used input parameters simulation tools. These consist 2D/3D CFD program analysis 1D model development optimization dimension. Finally, simulations compared on engine test bench.

参考文章(11)
Richard Stradling, Paul Gadd, Meinrad Signer, Claudio Operti, The Influence of Fuel Properties and Injection Timing on the Exhaust Emissions and Fuel Consumption of an Iveco Heavy-Duty Diesel Engine SAE Technical Paper Series. ,vol. 106, pp. 1739- 1765 ,(1997) , 10.4271/971635
M. Signer, P. Heinze, R. Mercogliano, H. J. Stein, European Programme on Emissions, Fuels and Engine Technologies (EPEFE)-Heavy Duty Diesel Study SAE transactions. ,vol. 105, pp. 564- 579 ,(1996) , 10.4271/961074
Christian Winkler, Peter Flörchinger, M. D. Patil, Jürgen Gieshoff, Paul Spurk, Marcus Pfeifer, Modeling of SCR DeNOx Catalyst - Looking at the Impact of Substrate Attributes SAE transactions. ,vol. 112, pp. 691- 699 ,(2003) , 10.4271/2003-01-0845
Qingwen Song, George Zhu, Model-based Closed-loop Control of Urea SCR Exhaust Aftertreatment System for Diesel Engine SAE 2002 World Congress & Exhibition. ,(2002) , 10.4271/2002-01-0287
C. M. Schär, C. H. Onder, H. P. Geering, M. Elsener, Control of a Urea SCR Catalytic Converter System for a Mobile Heavy Duty Diesel Engine SAE transactions. ,vol. 112, pp. 1180- 1188 ,(2003) , 10.4271/2003-01-0776
Cornelis Havenith, Ruud P. Verbeek, Transient Performance of a Urea deNOx Catalyst for Low Emissions Heavy-Duty Diesel Engines SAE Technical Paper Series. ,vol. 106, pp. 278- 289 ,(1997) , 10.4271/970185
Rinie Van Helden, Marcel Van Genderen, Marc Van Aken, Ruud Verbeek, Joseph A. Patchett, Jan Kruithof, Ted Straten, Claire Gérentet De Saluneaux, Engine Dynamometer and Vehicle Performance of a Urea SCR-System for Heavy-Duty Truck Engines SAE 2002 World Congress & Exhibition. ,(2002) , 10.4271/2002-01-0286
William R. Miller, John T. Klein, Raimund Mueller, Winfried Doelling, Juergen Zuerbig, The Development of Urea-SCR Technology for US Heavy Duty Trucks SAE transactions. ,vol. 109, pp. 81- 88 ,(2000) , 10.4271/2000-01-0190
Minghui Kao, John J. Moskwa, Turbocharged Diesel Engine Modeling for Nonlinear Engine Control and State Estimation Journal of Dynamic Systems Measurement and Control-transactions of The Asme. ,vol. 117, pp. 20- 30 ,(1995) , 10.1115/1.2798519