Loop Ileostomy versus Loop Colostomy for Defunctioning Low Anastomoses during Rectal Cancer Surgery

作者: Eric Rullier , Nathalie Le Toux , Christophe Laurent , Jean-Luc Garrelon , Michel Parneix

DOI: 10.1007/S002680020091

关键词: ColostomyMedicineAnastomosisAbdominal surgeryIleostomyGeneral surgerySurgical anastomosisStoma (medicine)SurgeryColorectal cancerRectum

摘要: Several studies have compared loop ileostomy with colostomy to defunction colorectal anastomoses. The discordant results may be due the heterogeneity of indications. We therefore performed a retrospective study compare two procedures in homogeneous group patients operated on electively for rectal cancer. Among 462 consecutive undergoing resection cancer during 1986–1998, 60 had and 107 low anastomosis. groups were similar respect age, gender, obesity, tumor stage, duration before closure (109 vs. 104 days; p= 0.28). All stoma-related complications that occurred after construction stoma recorded. There no deaths groups. After construction, morbidity rate was significantly higher following than (35% 19%; 0.02). complication (34% 12%; 0.004). risk surgical reintervention related both twice as high (22% 9%; 0.03). this showed that, our experience, overall reoperation lower colostomy. This suggests is best procedure defunctioning anastomoses electively. recommend using surgery.

参考文章(17)
J Rutegård, S Dahlgren, Transverse colostomy or loop ileostomy as diverting stoma in colorectal surgery. Acta chirurgica Scandinavica. ,vol. 153, pp. 229- 232 ,(1987)
M. C. Lewis, L. Meleagros, G. A. Khoury, A. A. Lewis, Colostomy or ileostomy after colorectal anastomosis?: a randomised trial. Annals of The Royal College of Surgeons of England. ,vol. 69, pp. 5- 7 ,(1987)
Rullier, Laurent, Garrelon, Michel, Saric, Parneix, Risk factors for anastomotic leakage after resection of rectal cancer British Journal of Surgery. ,vol. 85, pp. 355- 358 ,(2003) , 10.1046/J.1365-2168.1998.00615.X
D. F. Altomare, O. C. Pannarale, L. Lupo, N. Palasciano, V. Memeo, M. Rubino, Protective colostomy closure: the hazards of a "minor" operation. International Journal of Colorectal Disease. ,vol. 5, pp. 73- 78 ,(1990) , 10.1007/BF00298472
Stanley M. Feinberg, Robin S. McLeod, Zane Cohen, Complications of loop ileostomy American Journal of Surgery. ,vol. 153, pp. 102- 107 ,(1987) , 10.1016/0002-9610(87)90209-1
H. D. W. M. van de Pavoordt, V. W. Fazio, D. G. Jagelman, I. C. Lavery, F. L. Weakley, The outcome of loop ileostomy closure in 293 cases International Journal of Colorectal Disease. ,vol. 2, pp. 214- 217 ,(1987) , 10.1007/BF01649508
Klaus-P. Riesener, Winfried Lehnen, Markus Höfer, Reinhard Kasperk, Joseph C. Braun, Volker Schumpelick, Morbidity of Ileostomy and Colostomy Closure: Impact of Surgical Technique and Perioperative Treatment World Journal of Surgery. ,vol. 21, pp. 103- 108 ,(1997) , 10.1007/S002689900201
S. Fasth, L. Hultén, Loop ileostomy: A superior diverting stoma in colorectal surgery World Journal of Surgery. ,vol. 8, pp. 401- 407 ,(1984) , 10.1007/BF01655089
Dehni, Schlegel, Cunningham, Guiguet, Tiret, Par C, Influence of a defunctioning stoma on leakage rates after low colorectal anastomosis and colonic J pouch-anal anastomosis. British Journal of Surgery. ,vol. 85, pp. 1114- 1117 ,(2003) , 10.1046/J.1365-2168.1998.00790.X
N. S. Williams, D. G. Nasmyth, D. Jones, A. H. Smith, De‐functioning stomas: A prospective controlled trial comparing loop ileostomy with loop transverse colostomy British Journal of Surgery. ,vol. 73, pp. 566- 570 ,(2005) , 10.1002/BJS.1800730717