Chiasmatic interpretative communities: an innovative methodology
作者： Ruth Billany
关键词: Management science 、 Narrative 、 Bricolage 、 Metaphor 、 Interpretation (philosophy) 、 Social research 、 Engineering ethics 、 Sociology 、 Social policy 、 Qualitative research 、 Focus group
摘要: Purpose – Qualitative social research strives to deepen our understanding of aspects everyday human life and the narrative metaphor people living storied lives is re‐created in focus group method. The purpose this paper propose an innovative methodology for research, that is, chiasmatic interpretative communities (CIC).Design/methodology/approach importance evidence‐based inform future policy practice depends on trustworthy information chosen design or must fit purpose. strengths limitations method are critically evaluated. Potential issues accuracy during analysis resolved by informing interpretation discourse with experts from community.Findings Chiasmatic offer a re‐imagined synthesis repeated approach, community as interpreters.Research limitations/implications This blurs two methodological boundaries to...
cdu.edu.au
sci-hub.se 参考文章(85)
Margaret Anne Walshaw, Paradox, partiality and promise : a politics for girls in school mathematics : a thesis submitted to the Institute of Fundamental Sciences, Massey University, for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Massey University. ,(1999)
Rosaline S. Barbour, Doing Focus Groups ,(2008)
David L. Morgan, Planning Focus Groups ,(1997)
Marek Fodor, Donna L. Hoffman, Can You Measure the ROI of Your Social Media Marketing Social Science Research Network. ,(2010)
Ruth Bernadette Billany, Of healthy woman [i.e. women] and horses : a thesis presented in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree Master in Psychology at Massey University, Turitea Campus, Palmerston North, New Zealand Massey University. ,(2005)
Simon C Kitto, Janice Chesters, Carol Grbich, Quality in qualitative research. The Medical Journal of Australia. ,vol. 188, pp. 243- 246 ,(2008) , 10.5694/J.1326-5377.2008.TB01595.X
Catherine Pope, Sue Ziebland, Nicholas Mays, Analysing qualitative data BMJ. ,vol. 320, pp. 114- 116 ,(2000) , 10.1136/BMJ.320.7227.114
Dilmi Aluwihare-Samaranayake, Ethics in qualitative research: A view of the participants' and researchers' world from a critical standpoint The International Journal of Qualitative Methods. ,vol. 11, pp. 64- 81 ,(2012) , 10.1177/160940691201100208
Eileen Mary Willis, Tom Jenkin, Meryl Winsome Churchill, Adapting focus group methods to fit Aboriginal community-based research RMIT Publishing. ,vol. 5, pp. 112- ,(2005)
Brent D. Slife, Frank C. Richardson, Jeffrey S. Reber, Critical Thinking about Psychology: Hidden Assumptions and Plausible Alternatives ,(2005)