Life cycle environmental and economic implications of small drinking water system upgrades to reduce disinfection byproducts.

作者: Weiwei Mo , Pablo K. Cornejo , James P. Malley , Tyler E. Kane , M. Robin Collins

DOI: 10.1016/J.WATRES.2018.06.047

关键词: Carbon footprintOzoneRaw waterEconomic impact analysisEconomic costEnvironmental scienceEnvironmental engineeringWater qualityEmbodied energyChloramination

摘要: Abstract Many of the small drinking water systems in US that utilize simple filtration and chlorine disinfection or alone are facing byproduct (DBP) noncompliance issues, which need immediate upgrades. In this study, four potential upgrade scenarios, namely GAC, ozone, UV30, UV186 were designed for a typical compared terms embodied energy, carbon footprint, life cycle cost. These scenarios to either reduce amount DBP precursors using granular activated (the GAC scenario) ozonation ozone scenario), replace with UV at different intensities followed by chloramination UV30 scenarios). The scenario was found have lowest energy (417 GJ/year) cost ($0.25 million dollars), while has footprint (21 Mg CO 2 e/year). consistently presents highest environmental economic impacts. major contributors impacts individual also differ. Energy and/or material consumptions during operation phase dominate infrastructure investments noticeable contribution costs. results sensitive changes quality. An increase raw quality, i.e., an organic precursor content, could potentially result being least intensive scenario, decrease quality greatly overall competitiveness scenario.

参考文章(45)
Elizabeth J. Hilkert Colby, Thomas M. Young, Peter G. Green, Jeannie L. Darby, Costs of Arsenic Treatment for Potable Water in California and Comparison to U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Affordability Metrics Journal of The American Water Resources Association. ,vol. 46, pp. 1238- 1254 ,(2010) , 10.1111/J.1752-1688.2010.00488.X
Ralph Horne, Tim Grant, Karli Verghese, Life Cycle Assessment: Principles, Practice and Prospects ,(2009)
Aidan R. Cecchetti, Harrison Roakes, M. Robin Collins, Influence of selected variables on trihalomethane removals by spray aeration Journal American Water Works Association. ,vol. 106, ,(2014) , 10.5942/JAWWA.2014.106.0021
James L. Weishaar, George R. Aiken, Brian A. Bergamaschi, Miranda S. Fram, Roger Fujii, Kenneth Mopper, Evaluation of specific ultraviolet absorbance as an indicator of the chemical composition and reactivity of dissolved organic carbon. Environmental Science & Technology. ,vol. 37, pp. 4702- 4708 ,(2003) , 10.1021/ES030360X
Peter Bayer, Edda Heuer, Ute Karl, Michael Finkel, Economical and ecological comparison of granular activated carbon (GAC) adsorber refill strategies Water Research. ,vol. 39, pp. 1719- 1728 ,(2005) , 10.1016/J.WATRES.2005.02.005
Ali Al-Karaghouli, Lawrence L. Kazmerski, Energy Consumption and Water Production Cost of Conventional and Renewable-Energy-Powered Desalination Processes Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews. ,vol. 24, pp. 343- 356 ,(2013) , 10.1016/J.RSER.2012.12.064
Elorri Igos, Alice Dalle, Ligia Tiruta-Barna, Enrico Benetto, Isabelle Baudin, Yoann Mery, Life Cycle Assessment of water treatment: what is the contribution of infrastructure and operation at unit process level? Journal of Cleaner Production. ,vol. 65, pp. 424- 431 ,(2014) , 10.1016/J.JCLEPRO.2013.07.061
R.G. Raluy, L. Serra, J. Uche, Life cycle assessment of desalination technologies integrated with renewable energies Desalination. ,vol. 183, pp. 81- 93 ,(2005) , 10.1016/J.DESAL.2005.04.023
E. Friedrich, S. Pillay, C.A. Buckley, Carbon footprint analysis for increasing water supply and sanitation in South Africa: a case study Journal of Cleaner Production. ,vol. 17, pp. 1- 12 ,(2009) , 10.1016/J.JCLEPRO.2008.03.004
B. Godskesen, M. Hauschild, M. Rygaard, K. Zambrano, H.-J. Albrechtsen, Life-cycle and freshwater withdrawal impact assessment of water supply technologies Water Research. ,vol. 47, pp. 2363- 2374 ,(2013) , 10.1016/J.WATRES.2013.02.005