Psychometricians’ Beliefs About Learning:

作者: Lorrie A. Shepard

DOI: 10.3102/0013189X020007002

关键词: Social psychologyCurriculumSequence learningBehaviorismCriterion-referenced testImplicit learningMathematics educationExperiential learningLearning theoryPsychologyTeaching to the test

摘要: The author contends that disputes within the measurement community about what constitutes legitimate test preparation and whether “teaching to test” is good or bad for student learning can be explained by differences in specialists beliefs learning. Qualitative analysis of interview data from a nationally representative sample 50 district testing directors revealed approximately half operate implicit theories advocate, first, close alignment tests with curriculum and, second, judicious teaching tested content. Historical quotations are used show these beliefs, associated criterion-referenced testing, derive behaviorist theory, which requires sequential mastery constituent skills explicit each step. sequential, facts-before-thinking model contradicted, however, substantial body evidence cognitive psychology. Implicit should ma...

参考文章(35)
Robert Glaser, Education and Thinking: The Role of Knowledge. American Psychologist. ,vol. 39, pp. 93- 104 ,(1984) , 10.1037/0003-066X.39.2.93
Robert Glaser, Instructional technology and the measurement of learing outcomes: Some questions. American Psychologist. ,vol. 18, pp. 519- 521 ,(1963) , 10.1037/H0049294
William A. Mehrens, John Kaminski, Methods for Improving Standardized Test Scores: Fruitful, Fruitless, or Fraudulent? Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice. ,vol. 8, pp. 14- 22 ,(1989) , 10.1111/J.1745-3992.1989.TB00304.X
B. F. Skinner, The science of learning and the art of teaching. Harvard Educational Review. ,vol. 24, pp. 86- 97 ,(1954)
Robert M. Gagne, The conditions of learning, 2nd ed. Holt, Rinehart & Winston. ,(1970)
Robert L. Linn, Educational measurement, 3rd ed. American Council on Education. ,(1989)
L Auren B. R Esnick, EDUCATION AND LEARNING TO THINK ,(1987)