Turning ‘evidence for development’ on its head: A view from Africa

作者: Ruth Stewart

DOI: 10.14324/RFA.05.1.13

关键词: Economic growthInclusion (education)Political sciencePovertyInequalityDecolonialityPatriarchyEvidence-based practiceNorm (philosophy)African philosophy

摘要: The ‘evidence for development’ community aims to produce research that is useful and used address issues of poverty inequality, largely in low- middle-income countries (often referred as the ‘global South’). unspoken norm, however, much engagement, funding attention focused on organizations individuals global North, with assumption they are effective supporting needs South. In this paper, I explore initiatives working within Africa, using lens African philosophy ubuntu. present findings from a programme work undertaken across Africa identify better understand innovation evidence-informed decision-making taking place continent. demonstrate that, while resource-poor not well publicized, evidence world leading number respects. These include interconnections its continent-wide network, engagement some governments ecosystem. Reflecting these findings, discuss critique underlying foundations patriarchy, development coloniality shape field development’. highlight how, an era decoloniality, post-‘development’ antipatriarchy, risks becoming outdated being ineffective if it does engage challenges inherent concepts. argue alternative ubuntu enables us celebrate successes Southern communities, together level footing North tackle inequality through use evidence.

参考文章(13)
Nelson Maldonado-Torres, On the coloniality of being: Contributions to the development of a concept Cultural Studies. ,vol. 21, pp. 240- 270 ,(2007) , 10.1080/09502380601162548
Nelson Maldonado-Torres, , Césaire’s Gift and the Decolonial Turn Radical Philosophy Review. ,vol. 9, pp. 111- 138 ,(2006) , 10.5840/RADPHILREV20069217
Sandy Oliver, Mukdarut Bangpan, Claire Stansfield, Ruth Stewart, Capacity for conducting systematic reviews in low- and middle-income countries: a rapid appraisal Health Research Policy and Systems. ,vol. 13, pp. 23- 23 ,(2015) , 10.1186/S12961-015-0012-0
Stephen R Hanney, Sophie Castle-Clarke, Jonathan Grant, Susan Guthrie, Chris Henshall, Jorge Mestre-Ferrandiz, Michele Pistollato, Alexandra Pollitt, Jon Sussex, Steven Wooding, How long does biomedical research take? Studying the time taken between biomedical and health research and its translation into products, policy, and practice Health Research Policy and Systems. ,vol. 13, pp. 1- 18 ,(2015) , 10.1186/1478-4505-13-1
Achille Mbembe, On The Postcolony: A Brief Response to Critics Qui Parle. ,vol. 15, pp. 1- 49 ,(2005) , 10.1215/QUIPARLE.15.2.1
Ruth Stewart, Harsha Dayal, Laurenz Langer, Terminology and tensions within evidence-informed decision-making in South Africa over a 15-year period Research for All. ,vol. 1, pp. 252- 264 ,(2017) , 10.18546/RFA.01.2.03
Sunet Jordaan, Ruth Stewart, Yvonne Erasmus, Louis Maluwa, Janine Mitchell, Laurenz Langer, Russell Wildeman, Natalie Tannous, Josee Koch, Reflections on mentoring experiences for evidence-informed decision-making in South Africa and Malawi Development in Practice. ,vol. 28, pp. 456- 467 ,(2018) , 10.1080/09614524.2018.1444733
Rose N Oronje, Eliya M Zulu, Contribution of a Network of Parliamentary Committees of Health to the Ecosystem of Evidence Use in African Parliaments. Evidence & Policy: A Journal of Research, Debate and Practice. ,vol. 14, pp. 523- 535 ,(2018) , 10.1332/174426418X15314037224599
Ruth Stewart, Laurenz Langer, Yvonne Erasmus, An integrated model for increasing the use of evidence by decision-makers for improved development Development Southern Africa. ,vol. 36, pp. 616- 631 ,(2019) , 10.1080/0376835X.2018.1543579
Mogobe Bernard Ramose, Towards a post-conquest South Africa: beyond the constitution of 1996 South African Journal on Human Rights. ,vol. 34, pp. 326- 341 ,(2018) , 10.1080/02587203.2018.1550937