The effects of the mining operation activities permit process on the mining sector in Turkey
作者： Taşkın Deniz Yıldız , Orhan Kural
DOI: 10.1016/J.RESOURPOL.2020.101868
关键词: Receipt 、 Order (business) 、 Investment (macroeconomics) 、 Ranking 、 Work (electrical) 、 Business 、 Work permit 、 Finance 、 License 、 Natural resource
摘要: Abstract The most important problems faced by mining are the long permit application periods and obstacle to bureaucracy. In Turkey, operating license operation permits given Mining Petroleum Affairs Department (MAPEG) affiliated Ministry of Energy Natural Resources (MENR). However, in order start activities today, it is necessary obtain permissions from 15 20 separate units 8–10 different Ministries. requirement permission such a large number institutions carry out causes delays investment losses process. find solutions these problems, some questions were asked companies 2018 through SurveyMonkey. According survey, other Turkey (such as “landownership permit” “business work permit”) mostly enterprises period 3–34 months. This indicates that rule “permits required for should be completed within 3 months at latest EIA process” does not Turkey. addition, this caused an average loss 21% total amounts enterprises. Turkey's ranking world attractiveness index (IAI) categories decrease or become unstable. Moreover, many investors stop investing Completion processes certain time will remove major investor. require issued 2–6 receipt license. Increasing security reduce risks investments, which enable sector develop rapidly.
sci-hub.st 参考文章(58)
Elizabeth Bastida, A Review of the Concept of Security of Mineral Tenure: Issues and Challenges Journal of energy and natural resources law. ,vol. 19, pp. 31- 43 ,(2001) , 10.1080/02646811.2001.11433214
Allan Trench, Daniel J. Packey, John Sykes, Non-Technical Risks and Their Impact on the Mining Industry Mineral Resource and Ore Reserve Estimation: the AUSIMM guide to good practice. pp. 605- 617 ,(2014)
Marek Nieć, Krzysztof Galos, Krzysztof Szamałek, Main challenges of mineral resources policy of Poland Resources Policy. ,vol. 42, pp. 93- 103 ,(2014) , 10.1016/J.RESOURPOL.2014.10.010
John R. Owen, Deanna Kemp, Social licence and mining: A critical perspective Resources Policy. ,vol. 38, pp. 29- 35 ,(2013) , 10.1016/J.RESOURPOL.2012.06.016
Jason Prno, D. Scott Slocombe, Exploring the origins of ‘social license to operate’ in the mining sector: Perspectives from governance and sustainability theories Resources Policy. ,vol. 37, pp. 346- 357 ,(2012) , 10.1016/J.RESOURPOL.2012.04.002
Benedict Y. Imbun, Maintaining land use agreements in Papua New Guinea Mining: ‘Business as usual’? Resources Policy. ,vol. 38, pp. 310- 319 ,(2013) , 10.1016/J.RESOURPOL.2013.04.003
Richard Parsons, Justine Lacey, Kieren Moffat, Maintaining legitimacy of a contested practice: How the minerals industry understands its ‘social licence to operate’ Resources Policy. ,vol. 41, pp. 83- 90 ,(2014) , 10.1016/J.RESOURPOL.2014.04.002
Soili Nysten-Haarala, Elena Klyuchnikova, Heidi Helenius, Law and self-regulation: substitutes or complements in gaining social acceptance? Resources Policy. ,vol. 45, pp. 52- 64 ,(2015) , 10.1016/J.RESOURPOL.2015.02.008
Jason Prno, An analysis of factors leading to the establishment of a social licence to operate in the mining industry Resources Policy. ,vol. 38, pp. 577- 590 ,(2013) , 10.1016/J.RESOURPOL.2013.09.010
Heidi Tiainen, Rauno Sairinen, Viktor Novikov, Mining in the Chatkal Valley in Kyrgyzstan—Challenge of social sustainability Resources Policy. ,vol. 39, pp. 80- 87 ,(2014) , 10.1016/J.RESOURPOL.2013.11.005