Efficacy of a Multiple-Capture Live Trap for Small Mammals

作者: Jerrold L. Belant , Steve K. Windels

DOI:

关键词: Species diversityAnimal scienceTrap (plumbing)Species richnessPeanut butterSciurusEastern chipmunkGeographyHabitatLeast chipmunk

摘要: We compared the efficacy of Victor® Tin Cat® and Sherman live traps for capturing small mammals in northern hardwood red pine (Pinus resinosa) stands north-central Upper Peninsula Michigan during 2001. Overall mean capture rates (total captures/100 adjusted trap nights) by habitat were greater (P 25 m; blocks >25 m from edge. All placed “most likely runway” positions, baited with rolled oats peanut butter, rebaited as necessary. Prebaiting was not conducted. Cotton to provide bedding. Traps set initially morning checked 3 times each day 4 days, resulting 100 20 unadjusted nights/block Cat traps, respectively. Individuals captured identified species released at their respective sites. followed animal care use guidelines outlined American Society Mammalogists (1987). To standardize trapping effort, that sprung using 0.5 time intervals (that is, nights; Belant 1992; Beauvais Buskirk 1999). allowed multiple captures unless disturbed or missing. calculated number captures/ nights type both habitats. also excluding sciurids (red squirrel [Tamiasciurus hudsonicus], eastern chipmunk [T. striatus], least [Eutamius sciurus]), these too large enter traps. OHIO JOURNAL OF SCIENCE 17 J. L. BELANT AND S. K. WINDELS FIGURE 1. (top) (bottom) used trials, Michigan, July Because unequal variances, we Wilcoxon rank sum tests (Zar 1984) compare scores between types PROC NPAR1WAY (SAS Institute Inc. 1990). Means are reported +1.0 standard error; statistical significance established P <0.050. Species Richness, Shannon-Weiner, Simpson’s indices diversity (Colinvaux 1986; Kirkland Richness (S) is a measure documented capture. The Shannon-Weiner index (H') measures probability selecting identity an individual taken sample random equation:

参考文章(16)
Michael Howard Smith, Relative Efficiencies of Four Small Mammal Traps Journal of Mammalogy. ,vol. 53, pp. 868- 873 ,(1972) , 10.2307/1379222
Jeff Bowman, Graham Forbes, Tim Dilworth, Landscape context and small-mammal abundance in a managed forest Forest Ecology and Management. ,vol. 140, pp. 249- 255 ,(2001) , 10.1016/S0378-1127(00)00315-7
M. J. O'Farrell, W. A. Clark, F. H. Emmerson, S. M. Juarez, F. R. Kay, T. M. O'Farrell, T. Y. Goodlett, Use of a Mesh Live Trap for Small Mammals: Are Results from Sherman Live Traps Deceptive? Journal of Mammalogy. ,vol. 75, pp. 692- 699 ,(1994) , 10.2307/1382517
John A. Sealander, Douglas James, Relative Efficiency of Different Small Mammal Traps Journal of Mammalogy. ,vol. 39, pp. 215- 223 ,(1958) , 10.2307/1376194
Charlotte Von Trebra, Denis P. Lavender, Thomas P. Sullivan, Relations of Small Mammal Populations to Even-Aged Shelterwood Systems in Sub-Boreal Spruce Forest Journal of Wildlife Management. ,vol. 62, pp. 630- 642 ,(1998) , 10.2307/3802339
Jeff Bowman, Graham J Forbes, Tim G Dilworth, The spatial component of variation in small-mammal abundance measured at three scales Canadian Journal of Zoology. ,vol. 79, pp. 137- 144 ,(2001) , 10.1139/Z00-188
Robert T. Sugihara, Mark E. Tobin, Richard M. Engeman, EFFECTS OF INITIAL RAT CAPTURES ON SUBSEQUENT CAPTURE SUCCESS OF TRAPS Proceedings of the Vertebrate Pest Conference. ,vol. 16, ,(1994)
Jeff Bowman, Graham J. Forbes, Tim G. Dilworth, SPATIAL AND TEMPORAL PATTERNS OF AN IRRUPTING POPULATION OF DEER MICE Journal of Mammalogy. ,vol. 82, pp. 567- 572 ,(2001) , 10.1644/1545-1542(2001)082<0567:SATPOA>2.0.CO;2