Who am I/who are we in academic writing?L
作者： Irena Vassileva
DOI: 10.1111/J.1473-4192.1998.TB00128.X
关键词: Bulgarian 、 Written language 、 Contrastive linguistics 、 Psychology 、 Linguistics 、 Quantitative linguistics 、 Plural 、 Applied linguistics 、 Academic writing 、 German
摘要: One of the conspicuous differences infacademic discourse presentation is preference for use first person singular ‘I’ perspective in some languages versus plural ‘we’ others. This distinction due not so much to purely linguistic reasons as cultural ones. The purpose this paper present data concerning employment two perspectives English, German, French, Russian and Bulgarian research articles linguistics suggest explanations, well point certain cross-cultural misunderstandings which may result from established here. An attempt also made investigate cross-linguistic influences among five languages. analysis based on 5 corpora consisting 300 pages each language.
sci-hub.se 参考文章(6)
Henk Haverkate, Strategies in linguistic action Journal of Pragmatics. ,vol. 7, pp. 637- 656 ,(1983) , 10.1016/0378-2166(83)90088-7
G. MYERS, The pragmatics of politeness in scientific articles Applied Linguistics. ,vol. 10, pp. 1- 35 ,(1989) , 10.1093/APPLIN/10.1.1
Anna Mauranen, Contrastive ESP Rhetoric: Metatext in Finnish - English Economics texts. English for Specific Purposes. ,vol. 12, pp. 3- 22 ,(1993) , 10.1016/0889-4906(93)90024-I
Irena Vassileva, Some aspects of the rhetorical structure of specialized written discourse in English, Bulgarian and Russian International Journal of Applied Linguistics. ,vol. 5, pp. 173- 186 ,(1995) , 10.1111/J.1473-4192.1995.TB00079.X
James C. Raymond, I-Dropping and Androgyny: The Authorial "I" in Scholarly Writing. College Composition and Communication. ,vol. 44, pp. 478- ,(1993) , 10.2307/358383
Jeanne Heslot, Récit et commentaire dans un article scientifique DRLAV. Documentation et Recherche en Linguistique Allemande Vincennes. ,vol. 29, pp. 133- 154 ,(1983) , 10.3406/DRLAV.1983.996