Product Environmental Footprint (PEF) Pilot Phase—Comparability over Flexibility?
作者： Annekatrin Lehmann , Vanessa Bach , Matthias Finkbeiner , Marcel Görmer
DOI: 10.14279/DEPOSITONCE-8996
关键词: Footprint 、 Product (category theory) 、 Flexibility (engineering) 、 Life cycle impact assessment 、 Ecological footprint 、 Risk analysis (engineering) 、 Product category 、 Pilot phase 、 Comparability 、 Computer science
摘要: The main goal of the European product environmental footprint (PEF) method is to increase comparability impacts products within certain categories by decreasing flexibility and therefore achieving reproducibility results. Comparability supposed be further increased developing category specific rules (PEFCRs). aim this paper evaluate if PEF has been achieved. This done a comprehensive analysis guide, current PEFCR developed PEFCRs, as well insights gained from participating in pilot phase. reveals that its implementation PEFCRs are not able guarantee fair due shortcomings related (1) definition performance; (2) category; (3) determination representative product; (4) modeling electricity; (5) requirements for use secondary data; (6) circular formula; (7) life cycle impact assessment methods; (8) approach prioritize categories. For some these shortcomings, recommendations improvement provided. demonstrates improved comparability.
tu-berlin.de参考文章(25)
Anders Bjørn, Michael Zwicky Hauschild, Introducing carrying capacity-based normalisation in LCA: framework and development of references at midpoint level International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment. ,vol. 20, pp. 1005- 1018 ,(2015) , 10.1007/S11367-015-0899-2
Andrea Genovese, Adolf A. Acquaye, Alejandro Figueroa, S.C. Lenny Koh, Sustainable supply chain management and the transition towards a circular economy: Evidence and some applications $ Omega-international Journal of Management Science. ,vol. 66, pp. 344- 357 ,(2017) , 10.1016/J.OMEGA.2015.05.015
Simone Simões Amaral, João Andrade de Carvalho Jr, Maria Angélica Martins Costa, Cleverson Pinheiro, None, An Overview of Particulate Matter Measurement Instruments Atmosphere. ,vol. 6, pp. 1327- 1345 ,(2015) , 10.3390/ATMOS6091327
Jeroen B Guinée, Reinout Heijungs, Helias A Udo de Haes, Gjalt Huppes, None, Quantitative life cycle assessment of products 2. Classification, valuation and improvement analysis Journal of Cleaner Production. ,vol. 1, pp. 81- 91 ,(1993) , 10.1016/0959-6526(93)90046-E
Michele Galatola, Rana Pant, Reply to the editorial “Product environmental footprint—breakthrough or breakdown for policy implementation of life cycle assessment?” written by Prof. Finkbeiner (Int J Life Cycle Assess 19(2):266–271) International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment. ,vol. 19, pp. 1356- 1360 ,(2014) , 10.1007/S11367-014-0740-3
Maximilian Posch, Jyri Seppälä, Jean-Paul Hettelingh, Matti Johansson, Manuele Margni, Olivier Jolliet, The role of atmospheric dispersion models and ecosystem sensitivity in the determination of characterisation factors for acidifying and eutrophying emissions in LCIA International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment. ,vol. 13, pp. 477- 486 ,(2008) , 10.1007/S11367-008-0025-9
Jyri Seppälä, Maximilian Posch, Matti Johansson, Jean-Paul Hettelingh, Country-dependent Characterisation Factors for Acidification and Terrestrial Eutrophication Based on Accumulated Exceedance as an Impact Category Indicator (14 pp) The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment. ,vol. 11, pp. 403- 416 ,(2006) , 10.1065/LCA2005.06.215
Simone Manfredi, Karen Allacker, Nathan Pelletier, Erwin Schau, Kirana Chomkhamsri, Rana Pant, David Pennington, Comparing the European Commission product environmental footprint method with other environmental accounting methods International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment. ,vol. 20, pp. 389- 404 ,(2015) , 10.1007/S11367-014-0839-6
Matthias Finkbeiner, From the 40s to the 70s—the future of LCA in the ISO 14000 family International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment. ,vol. 18, pp. 1- 4 ,(2013) , 10.1007/S11367-012-0492-X
Annekatrin Lehmann, Vanessa Bach, Matthias Finkbeiner, Product environmental footprint in policy and market decisions: Applicability and impact assessment. Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management. ,vol. 11, pp. 417- 424 ,(2015) , 10.1002/IEAM.1658