Precancer in Animal Models: Sequentially Acquired or Predetermined?

作者: Robert D. Cardiff , Alexander D. Borowsky

DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4419-6694-0_8

关键词: BioinformaticsBreast cancerNeoplastic progressionTransplantationCancer stem cellGenetically Engineered MouseNatural historyMedicineEpigeneticsProstate

摘要: The natural history of cancer is still not clear. clinical starting point has been identified in precancerous intraepithelial neoplasms. We currently think neoplastic progression as a multi-step continuum involving multiple somatic mutations. Early detection programs have had enormous effects on mortality rates some cancers. However, patient populations seem to elude our best treatment efforts. Studies epithelial precancers animal models support the notion that biological potential cells fully encoded precancer. This implies subsequent events are primarily epigenetic and “code” will be better understood by examining rather than end-stage cancer. In this review opinion we focus breast experimental because they offer richest data sets for answering question posed title: Sequentially acquired or predetermined? large measure, result three critical components: (1) Longstanding efforts stratify precancer prognosis therapy response; (2) An array genetically engineered mouse (GEM) cancer; (3) Experimental model systems including transplantation technologies. There emerging which similar, however, other organ sites, both (prostate, pancreas, intestine) non-epithelial (glia, lymphoid), may lead related conclusions [1–5].

参考文章(83)
Jen-Lan Tsao, Simon Tavaré, Reijo Salovaara, Jeremy R. Jass, Lauri A. Aaltonen, Darryl Shibata, Colorectal adenoma and cancer divergence. Evidence of multilineage progression. American Journal of Pathology. ,vol. 154, pp. 1815- 1824 ,(1999) , 10.1016/S0002-9440(10)65437-5
Louis J. Notkin, The theory of biologic predeterminism: its questionable usefulness and validity as a medical tool Canadian Medical Association Journal. ,vol. 81, pp. 190- 191 ,(1959)
M. Scheffner, P. M. Howley, K. Munger, J. M. Huibregtse, INTERACTIONS OF HPV E6 AND E7 ONCOPROTEINS WITH TUMOUR SUPPRESSOR GENE PRODUCTS Cancer surveys. ,vol. 12, pp. 197- 217 ,(1992)
I. Berenblum, Carcinogenesis and Tumor Pathogenesis Advances in Cancer Research. ,vol. 2, pp. 129- 175 ,(1954) , 10.1016/S0065-230X(08)60493-5
Robert D. Cardiff, Protoneoplasia: the molecular biology of murine mammary hyperplasia. Advances in Cancer Research. ,vol. 42, pp. 167- 190 ,(1984) , 10.1016/S0065-230X(08)60458-3
William H. Woglom, The study of experimental cancer : a review Columbia University Press. ,(1913) , 10.7312/WOGL94224
M. Haaland, Spontaneous tumours in Mice s.n.]. ,(1911)
Azra J Alvi, Helen Clayton, Chirag Joshi, Tariq Enver, Alan Ashworth, Maria ad M Vivanco, Trevor C Dale, Matthew J Smalley, Functional and molecular characterisation of mammary side population cells Breast Cancer Research. ,vol. 5, pp. 1- 8 ,(2002) , 10.1186/BCR547
L Foulds, The experimental study of tumor progression: a review. Cancer Research. ,vol. 14, pp. 327- 339 ,(1954)
Fujio Kasumi, Yoshio Miki, Yuria Mano, Tatsuhiko Tsunoda, Toyomasa Katagiri, Masataka Yoshimoto, Meng-Lay Lin, Koichi Hirata, Yusuke Nakamura, Toshihik O. Nishidate, Genome-wide gene-expression profiles of breast-cancer cells purified with laser microbeam microdissection: identification of genes associated with progression and metastasis. International Journal of Oncology. ,vol. 25, pp. 797- 819 ,(2004) , 10.3892/IJO.25.4.797