Metasynthetic Madness: What Kind of Monster Have We Created?

作者: Sally Thorne

DOI: 10.1177/1049732316679370

关键词: SociologyCLARITYMonsterScholarshipInvestment (macroeconomics)CredibilityResearch literatureStandardizationEpistemologyQualitative metasynthesis

摘要: From its origins in the 1990s, qualitative health research metasynthesis project represented a methodological maneuver to capitalize on growing investment qualitatively derived study reports create an interactive dialogue among them that would surface expanded insights about complex human phenomena. However, newer forms positioning themselves as but representing much more technical and theoretically superficial form of scholarly enterprise have begun appear literature. It seems imperative we think through implications this trend determine whether it is be afforded credibility being scholarship and, if so, what kind represents. As standardization synthesis marches forward, will need clarity strong sense purpose are preserve essence was intended all about.

参考文章(44)
George W. Noblit, R. Dwight Hare, Meta-Ethnography: Synthesizing Qualitative Studies ,(1988)
Brenda H. Roe, Christine Webb, Reviewing research evidence for nursing practice : systematic reviews Published in <b>2007</b> in Oxford Malden MA by Blackwell Pub. ,(2007)
Margarete Sandelowski, Julie Barroso, Creating Metasummaries of Qualitative Findings Nursing Research. ,vol. 52, pp. 226- 233 ,(2003) , 10.1097/00006199-200307000-00004
Ray Pawson, Digging for Nuggets: How ‘Bad’ Research Can Yield ‘Good’ Evidence International Journal of Social Research Methodology. ,vol. 9, pp. 127- 142 ,(2006) , 10.1080/13645570600595314
Margarete Sandelowski, When a cigar is not just a cigar: alternative takes on data and data analysis. Research in Nursing & Health. ,vol. 34, pp. 342- 352 ,(2011) , 10.1002/NUR.20437
Geoff Wong, Trish Greenhalgh, Gill Westhorp, Jeanette Buckingham, Ray Pawson, RAMESES publication standards: realist syntheses Journal of Advanced Nursing. ,vol. 69, pp. 1005- 1022 ,(2013) , 10.1111/JAN.12095
David Moher, Alessandro Liberati, Jennifer Tetzlaff, Douglas G Altman, t PRISMA Group*, None, Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement Annals of Internal Medicine. ,vol. 151, pp. 264- 269 ,(2009) , 10.7326/0003-4819-151-4-200908180-00135