The value of postmortem examination in cases of metastasis of unknown origin-20-year retrospective data from a tertiary care center.

作者: Nabeel Al-Brahim , Catherine Ross , Beverly Carter , Katherine Chorneyko

DOI: 10.1016/J.ANNDIAGPATH.2004.12.003

关键词: Anaplastic carcinomaCancerSmall-cell carcinomaPathologyMalignancyAdenocarcinomaAutopsyMedicinePrimary tumorMetastasis

摘要: Abstract Background Metastasis of unknown origin (MUO) is a diagnostic challenge in clinical practice even with the state current advanced technology. To evaluate value autopsy determining primary site MUO, this study reviewed Hamilton experience—over last 20 years—with patients autopsied diagnosis MUO. Methods All diagnoses from cases performed at Health Sciences Center and St Joseph's Healthcare 1980 to 2000 were reviewed. Fifty-three MUO identified (MUO was defined as patient pathological and/or radiological metastatic tumor for which malignancy unknown). The history gross microscopic these Results There 31 men (58.5%) 22 women (41.5%) study. Their mean age 66 years. Pathological adenocarcinoma (n = 37), small cell carcinoma 6), anaplastic 3), undifferentiated 3). Primary tumors 27 (51%), most commonly lung 8), large bowel pancreas 4). Histochemical immunohistochemical stains helpful reaching 4 cases. Conclusions following observed: (1) series, establishing 51% cases, reaffirming postmortem examination instances; (2) frequent presenting MUO; (3) sites tumors; (4) careful histological examinations remain important tools identifying site.

参考文章(16)
José Ignacio Mayordomo, Juan Manuel Guerra, Carlos Guijarro, María Dolores García-Prats, Antonio Gómez, Marta López-Brea, Rosa González, Paloma Hergueta, Miguel Angel López-Pino, Francisco Martínez-Tello, Hernán Cortés-Funes, Neoplasms of unknown primary site: a clinicopathological study of autopsied patients Tumori. ,vol. 79, pp. 321- 324 ,(1993) , 10.1177/030089169307900507
Elizabeth C. Burton, Dana A. Troxclair, William P. Newman III, Autopsy diagnoses of malignant neoplasms: how often are clinical diagnoses incorrect? JAMA. ,vol. 280, pp. 1245- 1248 ,(1998) , 10.1001/JAMA.280.14.1245
Abdel G. Maiche, Cancer of Unknown Primary A Retrospective Study Based on 109 Patients American Journal of Clinical Oncology. ,vol. 16, pp. 26- 29 ,(1993) , 10.1097/00000421-199302000-00007
Robert T. Osteen, Gary Kopf, Richard E. Wilson, In pursuit of the unknown primary The American Journal of Surgery. ,vol. 135, pp. 494- 498 ,(1978) , 10.1016/0002-9610(78)90026-0
Stephen J. McPhee, The autopsy. An antidote to misdiagnosis. Medicine. ,vol. 75, pp. 41- 43 ,(1996) , 10.1097/00005792-199601000-00005
R. D. Snyder, G. M. Mavligit, M. Valdivieso, Adenocarcinoma of unknown primary site: a clinico-pathological study. Medical and Pediatric Oncology. ,vol. 6, pp. 289- 294 ,(1979) , 10.1002/MPO.2950060404
Lee Goldman, Robert Sayson, Stanley Robbins, Lawrence H. Cohn, Michael Bettmann, Monica Weisberg, The Value of the Autopsy in Three Medical Eras New England Journal of Medicine. ,vol. 308, pp. 1000- 1005 ,(1983) , 10.1056/NEJM198304283081704
Charles M. Haskell, Alistair J. Cochran, Sanford H. Barsky, Metastasis of unknown origin Current Problems in Cancer. ,vol. 12, pp. 5- 57 ,(1988) , 10.1016/S0147-0272(88)80007-2