The Promise of Participation and Decision-Making Power in Citizen Science

作者: Irene Eleta , Gemma Galdon Clavell , Valeria Righi , Mara Balestrini

DOI: 10.5334/CSTP.171

关键词: Public relationsPolitical scienceCitizen scienceScientific literacyInformed consentPrivacy by DesignDistributed knowledgeScientific evidenceData governanceInformation sharing

摘要: Citizen science is challenging professional researchers and their organizations to rethink the way they do connect with society. In any citizen project, are “making a promise” public about level of participation power in decision making that willing provide scientists. Researchers should set expectations explicitly ensure informed participation, trust, motivation. Also, design tools for consent, information sharing, recognition, privacy has be adapted new relations distributed knowledge production. Based on fieldwork experiences literature review environmental biomedical science, this article examines challenges proposes solutions for: 1) setting participation; 2) addressing concerns adapting consent evolving interests networked environments; 3) promoting governance research data. potential both increase scientific literacy counteract mistrust skepticism evidence global problems (such as climate change) need addressed. However, there still many fulfilling promise – example, empowering people gaining trust. A few inspiring initiatives help us reflect facilitation model engagement by design; models data provided

参考文章(18)
Muki Haklay, Citizen Science and Volunteered Geographic Information: Overview and Typology of Participation In: Sui, D and Elwood, S and Goodchild, M, (eds.) Crowdsourcing Geographic Knowledge: Volunteered Geographic Information (VGI) in Theory and Practice. (pp. 105-122). Springer Netherlands: Dordrecht, Netherlands. (2013). pp. 105- 122 ,(2013) , 10.1007/978-94-007-4587-2_7
David B. Resnik, Kevin C. Elliott, Aubrey K. Miller, A framework for addressing ethical issues in citizen science Environmental Science & Policy. ,vol. 54, pp. 475- 481 ,(2015) , 10.1016/J.ENVSCI.2015.05.008
Dilip V. Jeste, Lawrence Palinkas, Michael P. Caligiuri, Danielle Kukene Glorioso, Barton W. Palmer, James Henry, Reformed consent: adapting to new media and research participant preferences. IRB: Ethics & Human Research. ,vol. 31, pp. 1- 8 ,(2009)
Sherry R. Arnstein, A Ladder of Citizen Participation Journal of The American Planning Association. ,vol. 35, pp. 216- 224 ,(1969) , 10.1080/01944366908977225
Greg Newman, Andrea Wiggins, Alycia Crall, Eric Graham, Sarah Newman, Kevin Crowston, None, The future of citizen science: emerging technologies and shifting paradigms Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment. ,vol. 10, pp. 298- 304 ,(2012) , 10.1890/110294
Thomas Arthur, Alfred Phillips, Zanna Franks, Stacey Pearce, Redesigning Informed Consent: Enhancing Risk Communication Through a Novel Risk Visualization Tool Journal of Current Surgery. ,vol. 5, pp. 160- 164 ,(2015) , 10.14740/JCS275W
D. Kossmann, A. Brand, E. Hafen, Health Data Cooperatives – Citizen Empowerment Methods of Information in Medicine. ,vol. 53, pp. 82- 86 ,(2014) , 10.3414/ME13-02-0051
Pam Carter, Graeme T Laurie, Mary Dixon-Woods, The social licence for research: why care.data ran into trouble Journal of Medical Ethics. ,vol. 41, pp. 404- 409 ,(2015) , 10.1136/MEDETHICS-2014-102374
McKenzie F. Johnson, Corrie Hannah, Leslie Acton, Ruxandra Popovici, Krithi K. Karanth, Erika Weinthal, Network environmentalism: Citizen scientists as agents for environmental advocacy Global Environmental Change-human and Policy Dimensions. ,vol. 29, pp. 235- 245 ,(2014) , 10.1016/J.GLOENVCHA.2014.10.006