RESEARCH METHODS: THEIR DESIGN, APPLICABILITY AND RELIABILITY

作者: Gail Marshall , Margaret J. Cox

DOI: 10.1007/978-0-387-73315-9_62

关键词: Quality (business)Qualitative researchReliability (statistics)LogoSmall sampleStrengths and weaknessesComputer scienceManagement scienceResearch studiesResearch design

摘要: A review of research and evaluation studies into IT in education shows us strengths weaknesses. Both quantitative qualitative conducted the past have often been based on inadequate design, limited discussion settings or measurement development analysis. The consideration different educational small sample sizes many result difficulties generalizing results. Few linked to specific learning activities using tools, further compromising generalisability factors impacting innovation implementation seldom addressed, making less than useful a wider audience. Failure acknowledge that some questions, those Logo use, for example, are best answered by employing methods, has our understanding IT’s impact pupils’ learning. Similarly, basic differences epistemological theory consequent difference design analysis addressed community.Suggestions offered improving quality applicability future studies.

参考文章(63)
U. M. Staudinger, P. B. Baltes, Lifespan Developmental Psychology Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. pp. 751- 759 ,(2001) , 10.1007/978-3-642-59519-6_43
Mary Ziegler, Improving Practice through Action Research Adult learning. ,vol. 12, pp. 3- 4 ,(2001) , 10.1177/104515950101200102
Thomas C. Reeves, Evaluation of the Design and Development of IT Tools in Education Springer, Boston, MA. pp. 1037- 1051 ,(2008) , 10.1007/978-0-387-73315-9_65
Jim Ridgway, Vygotsky, informatics capability, and professional development Proceedings of the IFIP TC3 WG3.1/3.5 joint working conference on Information technology : supporting change through teacher education: supporting change through teacher education. pp. 3- 19 ,(1997) , 10.1007/978-0-387-35081-3_1
Celia Hoyles, Richard Noss, Looking back and looking forward Learning mathematics and logo. pp. 431- 468 ,(1992)