Need to Knowledge (NtK) Model: an evidence-based framework for generating technological innovations with socio-economic impacts

作者: Jennifer L Flagg , Joseph P Lane , Michelle M Lockett

DOI: 10.1186/1748-5908-8-21

关键词: Process (engineering)Knowledge translationPublic policyUpstream (petroleum industry)MedicineInvestment (macroeconomics)Industrial productionBest practiceDownstream (petroleum industry)Process management

摘要: Background: Traditional government policies suggest that upstream investment in scientific research is necessary and sufficient to generate technological innovations. The expected downstream beneficial socio-economic impacts are presumed occur through non-government market mechanisms. However, there little quantitative evidence for such a direct formulaic relationship between public at the input end marketplace benefits impact end. Instead, literature demonstrates innovation process involves complex interaction multiple sectors, methods, stakeholders. Discussion: authors theorize accomplishing full of deliberate systematic manner requires an operational-level model encompassing three underlying each designed knowledge outputs different states: generates conceptual discoveries; engineering development prototype inventions; industrial production commercial Given critical roles business, entire should continuously consider practical requirements constraints marketplace. Need Knowledge (NtK) Model encompasses activities required successfully innovations, along with associated strategies effectively communicating all states various stakeholders involved. It intentionally grounded drawn from academic analysis facilitate objective scrutiny, industry best practices enable application. Summary: offers practical, market-oriented approach avoids gaps, inefficiencies inherent undirected disconnected sectors. NtK means realizing increased returns on investments those science technology programs expressly intended impacts.

参考文章(50)
Robert G. Cooper, Scott J. Edgett, Elko J. Kleinschmidt, Benchmarking Best NPD Practices—II Research-technology Management. ,vol. 47, pp. 31- 43 ,(2004) , 10.1080/08956308.2004.11671606
Rajat Jayanthi Ranjan, Gera, Bridging the gap in knowledge transfer between academia and practitioners International Journal of Educational Management. ,vol. 26, pp. 252- 273 ,(2012) , 10.1108/09513541211213336
Geoffrey M Curran, Greer Sullivan, Peter Mendel, Michelle G Craske, Cathy D Sherbourne, Murray B Stein, Ashley McDaniel, Peter Roy-Byrne, Implementation of the CALM intervention for anxiety disorders: a qualitative study. Implementation Science. ,vol. 7, pp. 1- 11 ,(2012) , 10.1186/1748-5908-7-14
JAMES COUGHLAN, ROBERTO MANDUCHI, FUNCTIONAL ASSESSMENT OF A CAMERA PHONE-BASED WAYFINDING SYSTEM OPERATED BY BLIND AND VISUALLY IMPAIRED USERS. International Journal on Artificial Intelligence Tools. ,vol. 18, pp. 379- 397 ,(2009) , 10.1142/S0218213009000196
Lisa C. Troy, Tanawat Hirunyawipada, Audhesh K. Paswan, Cross-Functional Integration and New Product Success: An Empirical Investigation of the Findings Journal of Marketing. ,vol. 72, pp. 132- 146 ,(2008) , 10.1509/JMKG.72.6.132
Paul Shum, Grier Lin, A world class new product development best practices model International Journal of Production Research. ,vol. 45, pp. 1609- 1629 ,(2007) , 10.1080/00207540600942516
Jenine K Harris, Keith G Provan, Kimberly J Johnson, Scott J Leischow, Drawbacks and benefits associated with inter-organizational collaboration along the discovery-development-delivery continuum: a cancer research network case study Implementation Science. ,vol. 7, pp. 69- 69 ,(2012) , 10.1186/1748-5908-7-69
William H.A. Johnson, Managing university technology development using organizational control theory Research Policy. ,vol. 40, pp. 842- 852 ,(2011) , 10.1016/J.RESPOL.2011.04.001
Maureen Dobbins, Peter Rosenbaum, Nancy Plews, Mary Law, Adam Fysh, Information transfer: what do decision makers want and need from researchers? Implementation Science. ,vol. 2, pp. 20- 20 ,(2007) , 10.1186/1748-5908-2-20