Evaluación crítica de la evidencia científica
作者： A. Arteaga Domínguez , C. García González
DOI: 10.1016/S0048-7120(01)73219-7
关键词:
摘要: Resumen La evaluacion critica es una forma estructurada de leer los articulos cientificos, lo que permite extraer las caracteristicas clave mismos. Constituye uno elementos centrales la Medicina Basada en Evidencia. Un grupo expertos ha desarrollado «guias para usuarios literatura medica», se emplean diferentes cues-tionarios tipos publicaciones; todos cuestionarios estan organizados alrededor tres preguntas basicas: validez, importancia resultados y aplicabilidad. Sin embargo, estas guias no contemplan posibles disenos investigacion clinica, entre ellos muchos alternativos existen conocer eficacia efectividad del tratamiento rehabilitador. Ademas, rehabilitacion medidas son complejas diversas, debiendose comprobar han escogido mas relevantes acuerdo con el objetivo estudio y, sobre todo, dichas tengan aceptable fiabilidad validez.
elsevier.es参考文章(44)
T. Greenhalgh, How to read a paper: Papers that summarise other papers (systematic reviews and meta-analyses) BMJ. ,vol. 315, pp. 672- 675 ,(1997) , 10.1136/BMJ.315.7109.672
N Heddle, G Guyatt, H Shannon, R Jaeschke, S Walter, D Cook, Basic statistics for clinicians: 2. Interpreting study results: confidence intervals Canadian Medical Association Journal. ,vol. 152, pp. 169- 173 ,(1995)
N Heddle, G Guyatt, H Shannon, R Jaeschke, S Walter, D Cook, Basic statistics for clinicians: 4. Correlation and regression Canadian Medical Association Journal. ,vol. 152, pp. 497- 504 ,(1995)
Leigh Tooth, Use of sequential medical trials in rehabilitation research American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation. ,vol. 78, pp. 87- 97 ,(1999) , 10.1097/00002060-199901000-00023
ALAN J. NEVILLE, HAROLD I. REITER, KEVIN W. EVA, GEOFFREY R. NORMAN, Critical appraisal turkey shoot: linking critical appraisal to clinical decision making. Academic Medicine. ,vol. 75, pp. 87- ,(2000) , 10.1097/00001888-200010001-00028
Gordon H. Guyatt, R. Brian Haynes, Roman Z. Jaeschke, Deborah J. Cook, Lee Green, C. David Naylor, Mark C. Wilson, W. Scott Richardson, for the Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group, Users' Guides to the Medical Literature JAMA. ,vol. 284, pp. 1290- 1296 ,(2000) , 10.1001/JAMA.284.10.1290
Richard T. Katz, Denise I. Campagnolo, Gary Goldberg, Jerry C. Parker, Zachary M. Pine, John Whyte, Critical evaluation of clinical research Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. ,vol. 76, pp. 82- 93 ,(1995) , 10.1016/S0003-9993(95)80048-4
S. Barton, Which clinical studies provide the best evidence? The best RCT still trumps the best observational study. BMJ. ,vol. 321, pp. 255- 256 ,(2000) , 10.1136/BMJ.321.7256.255
Elena M. Andresen, Donald J. Lollar, Allan R. Meyers, Disability outcomes research: why this supplement, on this topic, at this time? Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. ,vol. 81, ,(2000) , 10.1053/APMR.2000.20614
M L Green, Graduate medical education training in clinical epidemiology, critical appraisal, and evidence-based medicine: a critical review of curricula. Academic Medicine. ,vol. 74, pp. 686- 694 ,(1999) , 10.1097/00001888-199906000-00017