The contribution of dystocia to the cesarean section rate

作者: Lena M. Macara , Karl W. Murphy

DOI: 10.1016/S0002-9378(94)70080-X

关键词: Teaching hospitalProspective auditDifficult laborReferral centerObstetricsMedicineSpontaneous laborObstetrics and gynaecology

摘要: OBJECTIVE: Our purpose was to examine the indications for performing cesarean sections in current obstetric practice and define measure true contribution of dystocia (“difficult labor”) overall section rate. STUDY DESIGN: A prospective audit done all performed during 1991 at The Queen Mother's Hospital, Glasgow, a teaching hospital tertiary referral center. RESULTS: rate 16.3%. Dystocia primary indication 16% but actually contributing factor, directly or indirectly, decision operate up 38% that year. Seventy-eight percent patients delivered because were spontaneous labor. We advocate more widespread use policy active management nulliparous women who labor spontaneously. If is addressed successfully, then many repeat may also be avoided. CONCLUSIONS: Improved women, such as labor, most useful approach reducing modern practice.

参考文章(18)
M Foley, D MacDonald, K O'Driscoll, Active management of labor as an alternative to cesarean section for dystocia. Obstetrics & Gynecology. ,vol. 63, pp. 485- 490 ,(1984)
Jack W. Pearson, Cesarean section and perinatal mortality American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. ,vol. 148, pp. 155- 159 ,(1984) , 10.1016/S0002-9378(84)80167-2
Randall S. Stafford, Alternative Strategies for Controlling Rising Cesarean Section Rates JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association. ,vol. 263, pp. 683- 687 ,(1990) , 10.1001/JAMA.1990.03440050077037
L. D. CARDOZO, D. M. F. GIBB, J. W. W. STUDD, R. V. VASANT, D. J. COOPER, Predictive value of cervimetric labour patterns in primigravidae. British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology. ,vol. 89, pp. 33- 38 ,(1982) , 10.1111/J.1471-0528.1982.TB04631.X
LIANE CLARK, MIRANDA MUGFORD, CATHERINE PATERSON, How does the mode of delivery affect the cost of maternity care British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology. ,vol. 98, pp. 519- 523 ,(1991) , 10.1111/J.1471-0528.1991.TB10362.X
Stephen A. Myers, Norbert Gleicher, Breech delivery: Why the dilemma? American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. ,vol. 156, pp. 6- 10 ,(1987) , 10.1016/0002-9378(87)90193-1
S. KRISHNAMURTHY, F. FAIRLIE, A. D. CAMERON, J. J. WALKER, J. R. MACKENZIE, The role of postnatal x-ray pelvimetry after caesarean section in the management of subsequent delivery. British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology. ,vol. 98, pp. 716- 718 ,(1991) , 10.1111/J.1471-0528.1991.TB13462.X
S M Taffel, P J Placek, T Liss, Trends in the United States cesarean section rate and reasons for the 1980-85 rise. American Journal of Public Health. ,vol. 77, pp. 955- 959 ,(1987) , 10.2105/AJPH.77.8.955
Geoffrey M. Anderson, Jonathan Lomas, Determinants of the increasing cesarean birth rate. Ontario data 1979 to 1982. The New England Journal of Medicine. ,vol. 311, pp. 887- 892 ,(1984) , 10.1056/NEJM198410043111405
Fiona Smaill, None, ANTIBIOTIC PROPHYLAXIS AND CAESAREAN SECTION British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology. ,vol. 99, pp. 789- 790 ,(1992) , 10.1111/J.1471-0528.1992.TB14407.X