Efficiency, Equity, and Corporate Responsibility in Imperfect Competition

作者: Victor J. Tremblay , Carol Horton Tremblay

DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4614-3241-8_19

关键词: EconomicsMicroeconomicsDynamic efficiencyMarket powerEquity (finance)Static efficiencyIndustrial organizationAllocative efficiencyEquity capital marketsEquity riskImperfect competition

摘要: A crucial objective in industrial organization is to evaluate whether or not imperfectly competitive markets perform well from society’s perspective. As we discussed Chap. 1, focus on three dimensions of market performance: static efficiency, dynamic and equity. Up this point, have spent most our time discussing efficiency issues. We now begin chapter with a review assessment what learned regarding imperfect competition different types inefficiency—market power (i.e., allocative inefficiency), X-inefficiency, rent-seeking behavior, technological change efficiency).

参考文章(38)
Robert Pitofsky, Beyond Nader: Consumer Protection and the Regulation of Advertising Harvard Law Review. ,vol. 90, pp. 661- ,(1977) , 10.2307/1340281
Douglas Birsch, John H. Fielder, The Ford Pinto Case: A Study in Applied Ethics, Business, and Technology SUNY series, case studies in applied ethics, technology, and society;. ,vol. 20, ,(1994)
Edward N. Wolff, Poverty and income distribution ,(2008)
David R. Barton, Richard E. Caves, Efficiency in U.S. manufacturing industries ,(1990)
Rolf Färe, C. A. Knox Lovell, Shawna Grosskopf, The measurement of efficiency of production ,(1985)
Edward P Lazear, Debra J Aron, The Introduction of New Products The American Economic Review. ,vol. 80, pp. 421- 426 ,(1990)
Timothy M. Smeeding, Jeffrey Thompson, Recent Trends in the Distribution of Income: Labor, Wealth and More Complete Measures of Well Being Research Papers in Economics. ,(2010)