作者: R.K. Gupta , R.P. Rudra , W.T. Dickinson , G.J. Wall
DOI: 10.4296/CWRJ1902103
关键词: Mathematics 、 Yield (engineering) 、 Infiltrometer 、 Hydrology 、 Rainfall simulator 、 Permeameter 、 Hydraulic conductivity
摘要: Various techniques available to determine saturated hydraulic conductivity involve different methodologies and analytical models in their computations. In this study, these differences are quantified relation the variations Ks estimates obtained by four techniques: Double Ring Infiltrometer (RI), Rainfall Simulator (RS), Guelph Permeameter (GP) (GI). Results show that values with GI RS have a higher mean than RI GP techniques. The yield exhibiting lower variability as compared those This study further revealed spatial temporal domains can be expected substantial due themselves.