Evolution of sediment permeability during burial and subduction

作者: H. Daigle , E. J. Screaton

DOI: 10.1111/GFL.12090

关键词: Grain sizeShear (geology)Permeability (earth sciences)Shearing (physics)Accretionary wedgeGeomorphologyGeologyConsolidation (soil)SubductionDiagenesisPetrology

摘要: We assembled a data set of permeability measurements from 317 subduction zone and reference site samples worldwide made over nearly 25 years scientific drilling. This allowed us to examine the influence grain size, structural domain, measurement type on permeabilities ranging 10−21 10−14 m2. found that porosity–permeability behavior is function clay-size fraction, which consistent with previous work. Sediments within slope, accretionary prism, fault-zone domains are strongly affected by shearing, alters burial. Consolidation, flow-through, transient pulse decay all provide comparable results. Measurements horizontal vertical show significant cm-scale anisotropy (ratio >10) in slope prism domains, further indicating shear deformation these domains. Laboratory consolidation trends match large-scale (102 m) field negligible shear, but tend underestimate rate reduction porosity loss where significant. Comparison downhole shows controlled higher-permeability (>10−15 m2) layers at meter tens meters scale, while wireline formation tester closely laboratory underthrust exhibit similar trends, suggests shallow (total burial <1 km) does not significantly alter incoming sediments. deeper analog 14 passive-margin maintained through diagenesis porosities <10%, suggesting observed informative for predicting depth following subduction.

参考文章(136)
F. J. Griffiths, R. C. Joshi, Change in pore size distribution due to consolidation of clays Geotechnique. ,vol. 39, pp. 159- 167 ,(1989) , 10.1680/GEOT.1989.39.1.159
Samuel H. Haines, Ben A. van der Pluijm, Matt J. Ikari, Demian M. Saffer, Chris Marone, Clay fabric intensity in natural and artificial fault gouges: Implications for brittle fault zone processes and sedimentary basin clay fabric evolution Journal of Geophysical Research. ,vol. 114, ,(2009) , 10.1029/2008JB005866
William R. Bryant, William Hottman, Peter Trabant, Permeability of Unconsolidated and Consolidated Marine Sediments, Gulf of Mexico Marine Georesources & Geotechnology. ,vol. 24, pp. 1- 14 ,(1975) , 10.1080/10641197509388149
Kitty L. Milliken, William L. Esch, Robert M. Reed, Tongwei Zhang, Grain assemblages and strong diagenetic overprinting in siliceous mudrocks, Barnett Shale (Mississippian), Fort Worth Basin, Texas AAPG Bulletin. ,vol. 96, pp. 1553- 1578 ,(2012) , 10.1306/12011111129
C. E. Neuzil, Abnormal pressures as hydrodynamic phenomena American Journal of Science. ,vol. 295, pp. 742- 786 ,(1995) , 10.2475/AJS.295.6.742
Dorit Matmon, Barbara A. Bekins, Hydromechanics of a high taper angle, low‐permeability prism: A case study from Peru Journal of Geophysical Research. ,vol. 111, ,(2006) , 10.1029/2005JB003697
A. Hildenbrand, S. Schlomer, B. M. Krooss, R. Littke, Gas breakthrough experiments on pelitic rocks: comparative study with N2, CO2 and CH4 Geofluids. ,vol. 4, pp. 61- 80 ,(2004) , 10.1111/J.1468-8123.2004.00073.X
W. G. D. Gray, K. Moran, C. A. Jarrett, 16. PERMEABILITY AND STRESS HISTORY OF SEDIMENT FROM THE CASCADIA MARGIN1 Proceedings of the Ocean Drilling Program. Scientific results. ,vol. 146, pp. 275- 280 ,(1995)