Confounder selection strategies targeting stable treatment effect estimators

作者: Stijn Vansteelandt , Stijn Vansteelandt , Wen Wei Loh

DOI: 10.1002/SIM.8792

关键词: InferenceConfoundingSelection (genetic algorithm)Propensity score matchingCovariateObservational studyEstimatorStatisticsCausal inferenceComputer science

摘要: Inferring the causal effect of a treatment on an outcome in observational study requires adjusting for observed baseline confounders to avoid bias. However, all covariates, when only subset are interest, is known yield potentially inefficient and unstable estimators effect. Furthermore, it raises risk finite-sample bias due model misspecification. For these stated reasons, confounder (or covariate) selection commonly used determine available covariates that sufficient confounding adjustment. In this article, we propose strategy focuses stable estimation particular, propensity score already includes adjust confounding, then addition associated with either or alone, but not both, should systematically change estimator. The proposal, therefore, entails first prioritizing inclusion model, using change-in-estimate approach select smallest adjustment set yields estimate. ability proposal correctly confounders, ensure valid inference following data-driven covariate selection, assessed empirically compared existing methods simulation studies. We demonstrate procedure three different publicly datasets inference.

参考文章(52)
T. P. Speed, Introduction to Fisher (1926) The Arrangement of Field Experiments Springer Series in Statistics. pp. 71- 81 ,(1992) , 10.1007/978-1-4612-4380-9_7
Ander Wilson, Brian J. Reich, Confounder selection via penalized credible regions. Biometrics. ,vol. 70, pp. 852- 861 ,(2014) , 10.1111/BIOM.12203
David C. Hoaglin, Misunderstandings about Q and ‘Cochran's Q test' in meta‐analysis Statistics in Medicine. ,vol. 35, pp. 485- 495 ,(2016) , 10.1002/SIM.6632
RUTH M. MICKEY, SANDER GREENLAND, THE IMPACT OF CONFOUNDER SELECTION CRITERIA ON EFFECT ESTIMATION American Journal of Epidemiology. ,vol. 129, pp. 125- 137 ,(1989) , 10.1093/OXFORDJOURNALS.AJE.A115101
Peter C Austin, Elizabeth A Stuart, Estimating the effect of treatment on binary outcomes using full matching on the propensity score Statistical Methods in Medical Research. ,vol. 26, pp. 2505- 2525 ,(2017) , 10.1177/0962280215601134
Daniela Dunkler, Max Plischke, Karen Leffondré, Georg Heinze, Augmented Backward Elimination: A Pragmatic and Purposeful Way to Develop Statistical Models PLoS ONE. ,vol. 9, pp. e113677- ,(2014) , 10.1371/JOURNAL.PONE.0113677
Mark J. van der Laan, Susan Gruber, Collaborative double robust targeted maximum likelihood estimation. The International Journal of Biostatistics. ,vol. 6, pp. 1- 71 ,(2010) , 10.2202/1557-4679.1181
Judea Pearl, James M. Robins, Sander Greenland, Confounding and Collapsibility in Causal Inference Statistical Science. ,vol. 14, pp. 29- 46 ,(1999) , 10.1214/SS/1009211805
Trevor J. Hastie, John M. Chambers, Statistical Models in S ,(1991)