A co-evolutionary perspective on business processes. Evidence from the performance appraisal of a service firm

作者: Vincenzo Uli

DOI: 10.1108/BPMJ-01-2016-0008

关键词: Adaptation (computer science)Knowledge managementSociologyService (economics)Single-subject designOrder (exchange)Business processPerformance appraisalProcess (engineering)Perspective (graphical)

摘要: What new empirical implications can emerge in the organizational adaptation domain by adopting a multi-level co-evolutionary theoretical perspective? How does performance appraisal process affect evolution of organization? The purpose this paper, positioned within research field, is to untangle complexity behind emergence, development, and extinction business processes over time, highlighting inner mechanisms process.,The work presented as longitudinal, single case study service firm. Scholars concur considering approach particularly reliable when investigating practice (Feldman, 2000; Howard-Grenville, 2005; Lazaric Denis, 2005). Data have been collected during 2014 through three main methods: unstructured interviews, meeting observations, direct observation participants.,From analysis, it emerges that impact routine on individual group dynamics determinant inertia resistance change. In particular, degree managerial control exerted, feedback scheme applied, interaction are predictors exploitation or exploration practice.,In order address exploratory nature work, further developments may deepen analysis comparing findings obtained different contexts, important similarities differences various sectors. Different settings might also be beneficial additional dimensions routines’ evolution, especially at organization level analysis.,The insights from serve useful inputs improve efficiency firm examined, identify possible foster knowledge production replication practice.,The perspective, has conceived deliberate search for multiple levels analysis.

参考文章(50)
Henry P. Knowles, Borje O. Saxberg, Organizational leadership of planned and unplanned change Futures. ,vol. 20, pp. 252- 265 ,(1988) , 10.1016/0016-3287(88)90081-X
Michael L Tushman, Elaine Romanelli, Organizational Evolution: A Metamorphosis Model of Convergence and Reorientation Research in Organizational Behavior. ,(1985)
Nils Stieglitz, Thorbjørn Knudsen, Markus C. Becker, Adaptation and inertia in dynamic environments Strategic Management Journal. ,vol. 37, pp. 1854- 1864 ,(2016) , 10.1002/SMJ.2433
JAMES G. MARCH, JOHAN P. OLSEN, THE UNCERTAINTY OF THE PAST: ORGANIZATIONAL LEARNING UNDER AMBIGUITY* European Journal of Political Research. ,vol. 3, pp. 147- 171 ,(1975) , 10.1111/J.1475-6765.1975.TB00521.X
Gianpaolo Abatecola, Research in organizational evolution. What comes next European Management Journal. ,vol. 32, pp. 434- 443 ,(2014) , 10.1016/J.EMJ.2013.07.008
Arie Y. Lewin, Henk W. Volberda, Co-evolution of global sourcing: The need to understand the underlying mechanisms of firm-decisions to offshore International Business Review. ,vol. 20, pp. 241- 251 ,(2011) , 10.1016/J.IBUSREV.2011.02.008
Manuel Bolsinger, Anna Elsäßer, Caroline Helm, Maximilian Röglinger, Process improvement through economically driven routing of instances Business Process Management Journal. ,vol. 21, pp. 353- 378 ,(2015) , 10.1108/BPMJ-02-2014-0011
James M. Bloodgood, Organizational routine breach response and knowledge management Business Process Management Journal. ,vol. 18, pp. 376- 399 ,(2012) , 10.1108/14637151211232605
Roberto Cafferata, Darwinist connections between the systemness of social organizations and their evolution Journal of Management & Governance. ,vol. 20, pp. 19- 44 ,(2016) , 10.1007/S10997-014-9303-Z