Comparison of Multiplex Ligation-Dependent Probe Amplification and Karyotyping in Prenatal Diagnosis

作者: Elisabeth M. Boormans , Erwin Birnie , Dick Oepkes , Robert Jan Galjaard , Gijsbertha H. Schuring-Blom

DOI: 10.1097/AOG.0B013E3181CBC652

关键词: GynecologyMultiplex ligation-dependent probe amplificationSample size determinationPrenatal diagnosisAneuploidyConfidence intervalPaired difference testAmniocentesisMedicineMultiplexObstetrics and gynaecology

摘要: OBJECTIVE: To estimate whether multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA), a molecular technique used for detecting the most common chromosomal aneuploidies, is comparable with karyotyping detection of aneuploidies chromosomes X, Y, 13, 18, and 21 in routine clinical practice to costs differences both techniques. METHODS: In this prospective, nationwide cohort study, we consecutively included 4,585 women who had an amniocentesis because their age (36 years or older), increased risk after prenatal screening, maternal anxiety. Amniotic fluid samples were tested independently MLPA karyotyping. The primary outcome was diagnostic accuracy detect 21. Secondary Measures turnaround time test results costs. A sample size calculated using critical noninferiority margin 0.002; therefore, at least 4,497 paired needed (one-sided alpha 0.05, power 0.90). RESULTS: Diagnostic 1.0 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.99-1.0), sensitivity 100% CI 0.96-1.0) specificity 0.999-1.0). statistically similar (noninferior) that (P CONCLUSION: practice, trisomies karyotyping, it reduces waiting lower (Obstet Gynecol 2010,115:297-303)

参考文章(27)
Tommy Gerdes, Maria Kirchhoff, Anne-Marie Lind, Gitte Vestergaard Larsen, Susanne Kjaergaard, Multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) in prenatal diagnosis-experience of a large series of rapid testing for aneuploidy of chromosomes 13, 18, 21, X, and Y Prenatal Diagnosis. ,vol. 28, pp. 1119- 1125 ,(2008) , 10.1002/PD.2137
Vincenzo Cirigliano, Gianfranco Voglino, Elena Ordoñez, Antonella Marongiu, M. Paz Cañadas, Maijo Ejarque, Laura Rueda, Elisabet Lloveras, Carme Fuster, Matteo Adinolfi, Rapid prenatal diagnosis of common chromosome aneuploidies by QF-PCR, results of 9 years of clinical experience Prenatal Diagnosis. ,vol. 29, pp. 40- 49 ,(2009) , 10.1002/PD.2192
Angelique J. A. Kooper, Brigitte H. W. Faas, Ellen Kater-Baats, Ton Feuth, Jasper C. J. A. Janssen, Ineke van der Burgt, Fred K. Lotgering, Ad Geurts van Kessel, Arie P. T. Smits, Multiplex Ligation-dependent Probe Amplification (MLPA) as a stand-alone test for rapid aneuploidy detection in amniotic fluid cells Prenatal Diagnosis. ,vol. 28, pp. 1004- 1010 ,(2008) , 10.1002/PD.2111
Wing C Leung, Elizabeth T Lau, Terence T Lao, Mary HY Tang, Rapid aneuploidy screening (FISH or QF-PCR): the changing scene in prenatal diagnosis? Expert Review of Molecular Diagnostics. ,vol. 4, pp. 333- 337 ,(2004) , 10.1586/14737159.4.3.333
Caroline Mackie Ogilvie, Alison Lashwood, Lyn Chitty, Jonathan J. Waters, Paul N. Scriven, Frances Flinter, The future of prenatal diagnosis: rapid testing or full karyotype? An audit of chromosome abnormalities and pregnancy outcomes for women referred for Down's Syndrome testing. British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology. ,vol. 112, pp. 1369- 1375 ,(2005) , 10.1111/J.1471-0528.2005.00695.X
Ignatia B. Van den Veyver, Arthur L. Beaudet, Comparative genomic hybridization and prenatal diagnosis. Current Opinion in Obstetrics & Gynecology. ,vol. 18, pp. 185- 191 ,(2006) , 10.1097/01.GCO.0000192986.22718.CC
Diane Van Opstal, Marjan Boter, Danielle de Jong, Cardi van den Berg, Hennie T Brüggenwirth, Hajo I J Wildschut, Annelies de Klein, Robert-Jan H Galjaard, Rapid aneuploidy detection with multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification: a prospective study of 4000 amniotic fluid samples. European Journal of Human Genetics. ,vol. 17, pp. 112- 121 ,(2009) , 10.1038/EJHG.2008.161
T.-H. Bui, Prenatal cytogenetic diagnosis: gone FISHing, BAC soon! Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology. ,vol. 30, pp. 247- 251 ,(2007) , 10.1002/UOG.5142
Jerome P. Kassirer, Incorporating Patients' Preferences into Medical Decisions New England Journal of Medicine. ,vol. 330, pp. 1895- 1896 ,(1994) , 10.1056/NEJM199406303302611
Ann Tabor, Mette Madsen, ErikB. Obel, John Philip, Jens Bang, BentNør Gaard-Pedersen, RANDOMISED CONTROLLED TRIAL OF GENETIC AMNIOCENTESIS IN 4606 LOW-RISK WOMEN The Lancet. ,vol. 327, pp. 1287- 1293 ,(1986) , 10.1016/S0140-6736(86)91218-3