Can Analysis of Variance Be More Significant

作者: Marla S. McIntosh

DOI: 10.2134/AGRONJ14.0177

关键词: Relevance (information retrieval)PsychologyMultivariate analysis of varianceExplained variationContext (language use)Mathematics educationBest practiceVariance inflation factorOmnibus testAgronomyOne-way analysis of variance

摘要: Recent widespread criticism of the lack statistical rigor in science journals has focused attention on need to improve standards for design and analysis research. This study examined role variance (ANOVA) context current concerns regarding validity appropriateness statistics scientific publications. One objective was suggest how ANOVA tables can be constructed enhance transparency integrity better assist interpretation data. The broader goal this generate new discussion, debate, ideas ANOVA. history status as assessing practical relevance students, authors, reviewers, editors, readers is discussed. Each component an table (sources variation, degrees freedom, sums squares, mean F values, P values) critiqued its information value. Using a criterion including components that provide essential key details experimental validating analysis, guidelines are provided constructing SIMPLE—Simple, Informative, Meaningful, Powerful, Logical, Effective. A prototype SIMPLE presented encourage further consideration debate best practices tables.

参考文章(48)
Edward E Gbur, Walter W Stroup, Kevin S McCarter, Susan Durham, Linda J Young, Mary Christman, Mark West, Matthew Kramer, Analysis of Generalized Linear Mixed Models in the Agricultural and Natural Resources Sciences ,(2020)
Ramon C Littell, Walter W. Stroup, George A. Milliken, Russell D. Wolfinger, Oliver Schabenberger, SAS for Mixed Models ,(2018)
Sir Ronald Aylmer Fisher, Statistical Methods for Research Workers ,(1925)
R. A. Fisher, The Arrangement of Field Experiments Springer Series in Statistics. pp. 82- 91 ,(1992) , 10.1007/978-1-4612-4380-9_8
Kenneth J. Moore, Philip M. Dixon, Analysis of Combined Experiments Revisited Agronomy Journal. ,vol. 107, pp. 763- 771 ,(2015) , 10.2134/AGRONJ13.0485
Daniel T. Voss, Resolving the Mixed Models Controversy The American Statistician. ,vol. 53, pp. 352- 356 ,(1999) , 10.1080/00031305.1999.10474489
Marco Acutis, Barbara Scaglia, Roberto Confalonieri, Perfunctory analysis of variance in agronomy, and its consequences in experimental results interpretation European Journal of Agronomy. ,vol. 43, pp. 129- 135 ,(2012) , 10.1016/J.EJA.2012.06.006