Risk Perception in a Developing Country: The Case of Chile

作者: Nicolás C. Bronfman , Luis A. Cifuentes

DOI: 10.1111/J.0272-4332.2003.00400.X

关键词: Social psychologyOrdinary least squaresPopulationVariance (accounting)PsychologyDeveloping countryNegative signDemographyExplanatory powerRisk perceptionSample (statistics)

摘要: In this work we characterize risk perception in Chile, based on the psychometric paradigm, exploring difference between perceived social and personal risk. For purpose, conducted a survey including 54 hazards, 16 attributes, 3 constructs. The survey, divided into four parts, was administered to 508 residents of Santiago, Chile. Using factor analysis, three main factors, which accounted for 80% sample's variance, were identified: 1, commonly called "Dread Risk" literature, explained 37% variance; 2, "Unknown Risk," 28%; 3, "Personal Effect," 15% variance. On average, individuals themselves as less exposed with more control knowledge about them than general population. OLS regression models used test association factors. risk, 1 had greatest explanatory power, while 2 negative sign. only factors significant, having power. Risk denial (defined risk) associated only, desired actual regulation levels proved positive all thus indicating that Chileans are dissatisfied current level hazards analyzed. comparison data at aggregate individual subject's suggests analysis overestimates magnitude correlations it still reflects tendency responses.

参考文章(40)
Paul Slovic, Baruch Fischhoff, Sarah Lichtenstein, Facts and Fears: Understanding Perceived Risk Policy and practice in health and safety. ,vol. 3, pp. 181- 216 ,(2005) , 10.1007/978-1-4899-0445-4_9
T MCDANIELS, L AXELROD, P SLOVIC, Perceived ecological risks of global change: A psychometric comparison of causes and consequences☆ Global Environmental Change-human and Policy Dimensions. ,vol. 6, pp. 159- 171 ,(1996) , 10.1016/0959-3780(96)00006-4
Paul Slovic, Baruch Fischhoff, Sarah Lichtenstein, Characterizing Perceived Risk Social Science Research Network. ,(1985)
Chris Fife-Schaw, Gene Rowe, Public Perceptions of Everyday Food Hazards: A Psychometric Study Risk Analysis. ,vol. 16, pp. 487- 500 ,(1996) , 10.1111/J.1539-6924.1996.TB01095.X
C. Karpowicz-Lazreg, E. Mullet, Societal risk as seen by the French public Risk Analysis. ,vol. 13, pp. 253- 258 ,(1993) , 10.1111/J.1539-6924.1993.TB01076.X
Robert William Kates, Jeanne X. Kasperson, Christoph Hohenemser, Perilous Progress: Managing The Hazards Of Technology ,(1985)
Ortwin Renn, Three decades of risk research: accomplishments and new challenges Journal of Risk Research. ,vol. 1, pp. 49- 71 ,(1998) , 10.1080/136698798377321
J. Richard Eiser, Bettina Hannover, Leon Mann, Michel Morin, Joop van Der Pligt, Paul Webley, Nuclear attitudes after chernobyl: a cross-national study Journal of Environmental Psychology. ,vol. 10, pp. 101- 110 ,(1990) , 10.1016/S0272-4944(05)80121-5
Bernd Rohrmann, Risk perception of different societal groups: Australian findings and crossnational comparisons Australian Journal of Psychology. ,vol. 46, pp. 150- 163 ,(1994) , 10.1080/00049539408259490