Understanding the Ecological Validity of Relying Practice as a Basis for Risk Identification

作者: T. Anderson , J. S. Busby , M. Rouncefield

DOI: 10.1111/RISA.13475

关键词: High reliability organizationEcological validityReliability (statistics)Risk analysis (engineering)Social practiceSociotechnical systemContingencySituational ethicsFormal organizationComputer science

摘要: Understanding the reliability of hazardous organizations and their protective systems is central to understanding risk they produce. Work on "high organization" has done much illuminate conditions in which social organization becomes reliable highly demanding conditions. But depends just as how relying entities do it does rely on. Patterns are often opaque sociotechnical systems, processes being relied mutually influencing complex ways, so relationship between may not be at all obvious. This study was an attempt a practice, particular analyzing had ecological validity organization-how practice responsive took place. involved observational fieldwork inductive, qualitative analysis offshore oil gas production platform that nearing end its design life undergoing refurbishment. The produced four main categories validity: responsiveness formal organization, situational contingency, information asymmetry, sociomateriality. should primary focus identification, assessing can become mismatched certain both when circumstances not.

参考文章(54)
Ivana Milosevic, A. Erin Bass, Gwendolyn M. Combs, The Paradox of Knowledge Creation in a High-Reliability Organization A Case Study Journal of Management. ,vol. 44, pp. 1174- 1201 ,(2018) , 10.1177/0149206315599215
Jerry Busby, Marian Iszatt-White, The Relational Aspect to High Reliability Organization Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management. ,vol. 22, pp. 69- 80 ,(2014) , 10.1111/1468-5973.12045
Barney G. Glaser, Conceptualization: On Theory and Theorizing Using Grounded Theory The International Journal of Qualitative Methods. ,vol. 1, pp. 23- 38 ,(2002) , 10.1177/160940690200100203
J. S. Busby, A. M. Collins, Organizational Sensemaking About Risk Controls: The Case of Offshore Hydrocarbons Production Risk Analysis. ,vol. 34, pp. 1738- 1752 ,(2014) , 10.1111/RISA.12198
Karl E. Weick, Karlene H. Roberts, Collective mind in organizations: Heedful interrelating on flight decks. Administrative Science Quarterly. ,vol. 38, pp. 357- 381 ,(1993) , 10.2307/2393372
Margaret J. Trotter, Paul M. Salmon, Michael G. Lenné, Impromaps: Applying Rasmussen’s Risk Management Framework to improvisation incidents Safety Science. ,vol. 64, pp. 60- 70 ,(2014) , 10.1016/J.SSCI.2013.11.021
Theodore R. Schatzki, Practices and Actions A Wittgensteinian Critique of Bourdieu and Giddens Philosophy of the Social Sciences. ,vol. 27, pp. 283- 308 ,(1997) , 10.1177/004839319702700301
Diane Vaughan, The Trickle-Down Effect: Policy Decisions, Risky Work, and the "Challenger" Tragedy California Management Review. ,vol. 39, pp. 80- 102 ,(1997) , 10.2307/41165888
William H. Starbuck, Frances J. Milliken, CHALLENGER: FINE-TUNING THE ODDS UNTIL SOMETHING BREAKS Journal of Management Studies. ,vol. 25, pp. 319- 340 ,(1988) , 10.1111/J.1467-6486.1988.TB00040.X