Moving forward in carcinogenicity assessment: Report of an EURL ECVAM/ESTIV workshop.

作者: Raffaella Corvi , Federica Madia , Kathryn Z. Guyton , Peter Kasper , Ruthann Rudel

DOI: 10.1016/J.TIV.2017.09.010

关键词: Alternative methodsLegislationCancer riskMedicineAnimal useRisk analysis (engineering)Nanotechnology

摘要: There is an increased need to develop novel alternative approaches the two-year rodent bioassay for carcinogenicity assessment of substances where still a basic requirement, as well those animal use banned or limited information gaps are identified within legislation. The current progress in this area was addressed EURL ECVAM- ESTIV workshop held October 2016, Juan les Pins. A number initiatives were presented and discussed, including data-driven, technology-driven pathway-driven approaches. Despite seemingly diverse range strategic developments, commonalities emerging. For example, providing insight into mechanisms becoming increasingly appreciated aspect hazard suggested be best strategy drive new developments. Thus, now more than ever, there combine focus efforts towards integration available between sectors. Such cross-sectorial harmonisation will aid building confidence approach methods leading implementation thus decreased necessity bioassay.

参考文章(54)
Andrew Knight, Jarrod Bailey, Jonathan Balcombe, Animal carcinogenicity studies: 1. Poor human predictivity. Atla-alternatives To Laboratory Animals. ,vol. 34, pp. 19- 27 ,(2006) , 10.1177/026119290603400117
Megan R. Schwarzman, Janet M. Ackerman, Shanaz H. Dairkee, Suzanne E. Fenton, Dale Johnson, Kathleen M. Navarro, Gwendolyn Osborne, Ruthann A. Rudel, Gina M. Solomon, Lauren Zeise, Sarah Janssen, Screening for Chemical Contributions to Breast Cancer Risk: A Case Study for Chemical Safety Evaluation. Environmental Health Perspectives. ,vol. 123, pp. 1255- 1264 ,(2015) , 10.1289/EHP.1408337
Gilly Griffin, Julie Dale, Elisabeth H Ormandy, Genetic engineering of animals: Ethical issues, including welfare concerns Canadian Veterinary Journal-revue Veterinaire Canadienne. ,vol. 52, pp. 544- 550 ,(2011)
Dana Loomis, Kathryn Guyton, Yann Grosse, Fatiha El Ghissasi, Véronique Bouvard, Lamia Benbrahim-Tallaa, Neela Guha, Heidi Mattock, Kurt Straif, None, Carcinogenicity of lindane, DDT, and 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid The Lancet Oncology. ,vol. 16, pp. 891- 892 ,(2015) , 10.1016/S1470-2045(15)00081-9
R. Herwig, H. Gmuender, R. Corvi, K. M. Bloch, A. Brandenburg, J. Castell, L. Ceelen, C. Chesne, T. Y. Doktorova, D. Jennen, P. Jennings, A. Limonciel, E. A. Lock, T. McMorrow, P. Phrakonkham, R. Radford, C. Slattery, R. Stierum, M. Vilardell, T. Wittenberger, R. Yildirimman, M. Ryan, V. Rogiers, J. Kleinjans, Inter-laboratory study of human in vitro toxicogenomics-based tests as alternative methods for evaluating chemical carcinogenicity: a bioinformatics perspective. Archives of Toxicology. ,vol. 90, pp. 2215- 2229 ,(2016) , 10.1007/S00204-015-1617-3
Erwin Annys, Richard Billington, Rick Clayton, Klaus-Dieter Bremm, Michael Graziano, Jo McKelvie, Ian Ragan, Michael Schwarz, Jan Willem van der Laan, Charles Wood, Mattias Öberg, Piet Wester, Kevin N. Woodward, Advancing the 3Rs in regulatory toxicology - Carcinogenicity testing: Scope for harmonisation and advancing the 3Rs in regulated sectors of the European Union. Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology. ,vol. 69, pp. 234- 242 ,(2014) , 10.1016/J.YRTPH.2014.04.009
J.P.J Van Oosterhout, J.W Van Der Laan, E.J De Waal, K Olejniczak, M Hilgenfeld, V Schmidt, R Bass, The Utility of Two Rodent Species in Carcinogenic Risk Assessment of Pharmaceuticals in Europe Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology. ,vol. 25, pp. 6- 17 ,(1997) , 10.1006/RTPH.1996.1077
Ruthann A Rudel, Kathleen R Attfield, Jessica N Schifano, Julia Green Brody, None, Chemicals causing mammary gland tumors in animals signal new directions for epidemiology, chemicals testing, and risk assessment for breast cancer prevention. Cancer. ,vol. 109, pp. 2635- 2666 ,(2007) , 10.1002/CNCR.22653