Density and Distinctiveness in Early Word Learning: Evidence From Neural Network Simulations.

作者: Samuel David Jones , Silke Brandt

DOI: 10.1111/COGS.12812

关键词: Word (computer architecture)Network performanceOptimal distinctiveness theoryAutoencoderPhonologySpeech recognitionArtificial neural networkContrast (statistics)Computer scienceVocabulary development

摘要: High phonological neighborhood density has been associated with both advantages and disadvantages in early word learning. may support the formation fine-tuning of new sound memories; a process termed lexical configuration (e.g. Storkel, 2004). However, high-density words are also more likely to be misunderstood as instances known words, therefore fail trigger learning Swingley & Aslin, 2007). To examine these apparently contradictory effects, we trained an autoencoder neural network on 587,954 tokens (5497 types; including mono- multi-syllabic all grammatical classes) spoken by 279 caregivers English-speaking children aged 18 24 months. We then simulated communicative development inventory administration compared performance that 2292 argue illustrates concurrent disadvantages, contrast prior behavioural computational literature treating such effects independently. Low error rates signal advantage for while high triggering low-density words. This interpretation is consistent application autoencoders academic research industry, simultaneous feature extraction (i.e. configuration) anomaly detection triggering). Autoencoder simulation how distinctiveness can emerge from common mechanism.

参考文章(31)
Amanda C. Walley, Jamie L. Metsala, Victoria M. Garlock, Spoken vocabulary growth: Its role in the development of phoneme awareness and early reading ability Reading and Writing. ,vol. 16, pp. 5- 20 ,(2003) , 10.1023/A:1021789804977
Christine L. Stager, Janet F. Werker, Infants listen for more phonetic detail in speech perception than in word-learning tasks Nature. ,vol. 388, pp. 381- 382 ,(1997) , 10.1038/41102
David E. Rumelhart, James L. McClelland, , Parallel distributed processing: explorations in the microstructure of cognition, vol. 1: foundations Computational Models of Cognition and Perception. ,(1986) , 10.7551/MITPRESS/5236.001.0001
STEPHANIE F. STOKES, The impact of phonological neighborhood density on typical and atypical emerging lexicons Journal of Child Language. ,vol. 41, pp. 634- 657 ,(2014) , 10.1017/S030500091300010X
Michael S Vitevitch, Holly L Storkel, None, Examining the acquisition of phonological word-forms with computational experiments Language and Speech. ,vol. 56, pp. 493- 527 ,(2013) , 10.1177/0023830912460513
Max Coltheart, The MRC Psycholinguistic Database Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology. ,vol. 33, pp. 497- 505 ,(1981) , 10.1080/14640748108400805
Susan E. Gathercole, Clive R. Frankish, Susan J. Pickering, Sarah Peaker, Phonotactic influences on short-term memory Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition. ,vol. 25, pp. 84- 95 ,(1999) , 10.1037/0278-7393.25.1.84
Anna V. Sosa, Carol Stoel-Gammon, Lexical and phonological effects in early word production. Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research. ,vol. 55, pp. 596- 608 ,(2012) , 10.1044/1092-4388(2011/10-0113)
Richard G. Schwartz, Laurence B. Leonard, Diane M. Frome Loeb, Lori A. Swanson, Attempted sounds are sometimes not: an expanded view of phonological selection and avoidance. Journal of Child Language. ,vol. 14, pp. 411- 418 ,(1987) , 10.1017/S0305000900010205
Robert Port, How are words stored in memory? Beyond phones and phonemes New Ideas in Psychology. ,vol. 25, pp. 143- 170 ,(2007) , 10.1016/J.NEWIDEAPSYCH.2007.02.001