Meta-analysis of data from the six primary prevention trials of cardiovascular events using aspirin.

作者: Alfred A. Bartolucci , George Howard

DOI: 10.1016/J.AMJCARD.2006.04.012

关键词: Odds ratioCohortPlaceboCardiologyMeta-analysisAspirinMyocardial infarctionStrokeMedicineInternal medicineRandomized controlled trial

摘要: Until recently, 5 major studies have formed the basis for use of aspirin (acetylsalicylic acid) in primary prevention cardiovascular (CV) events. Despite these data, role has not been established firmly. Six randomized trials evaluated benefits CV events: British Doctors' Trial, Physicians' Health Study, Thrombosis Prevention Hypertension Optimal Treatment study, Primary Project, and Women's Study. The combined sample consists 47,293 subjects on 45,580 or placebo. A meta-analysis 6 assessed end points: total coronary heart disease (CHD), nonfatal myocardial infarction (MI), events, stroke, mortality, all-cause mortality. No covariate adjustment was performed appropriate tests treatment effect, heterogeneity, study size bias were applied. Using odds ratios confidence intervals, suggested superiority CHD, MI, events (p ≤0.001 each case), with a nonsignificant trend (0.07 0.05). Given cohort, decreased risk this large patient sample. In conclusion, but there no significant differences incidences stroke

参考文章(21)
P Macaskill, P Glasziou, L Irwig, G Berry, Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test. Graphical test is itself biased. BMJ. ,vol. 316, pp. 470- 471 ,(1998)
M Egger, P Jüni, C Bartlett, F Holenstein, J Sterne, How important are comprehensive literature searches and the assessment of trial quality in systematic reviews? Empirical study. Health Technology Assessment. ,vol. 7, pp. 1- 76 ,(2003) , 10.3310/HTA7010
Kay Dickersin, Jesse A. Berlin, Meta-analysis: State-of-the-Science Epidemiologic Reviews. ,vol. 14, pp. 154- 176 ,(1992) , 10.1093/OXFORDJOURNALS.EPIREV.A036084
R Peto, R Gray, R Collins, K Wheatley, C Hennekens, K Jamrozik, C Warlow, B Hafner, E Thompson, S Norton, J Gilliland, R Doll, Randomised trial of prophylactic daily aspirin in British male doctors BMJ. ,vol. 296, pp. 313- 316 ,(1988) , 10.1136/BMJ.296.6618.313
Thomas C. Chalmers, Problems induced by meta-analyses. Statistics in Medicine. ,vol. 10, pp. 971- 980 ,(1991) , 10.1002/SIM.4780100618
Alfred A. Bartolucci, Charles R. Katholi, Karan P. Singh, Graciela S. Alarcón, Issues in meta‐analysis: An overview Arthritis Care and Research. ,vol. 7, pp. 156- 160 ,(1994) , 10.1002/ART.1790070310
Roger M. Harbord, Matthias Egger, Jonathan A. C. Sterne, A modified test for small‐study effects in meta‐analyses of controlled trials with binary endpoints Statistics in Medicine. ,vol. 25, pp. 3443- 3457 ,(2006) , 10.1002/SIM.2380