The impact of context manipulation on knowledge development in a balancing task

作者: Daniel Peterson Bullard

DOI:

关键词: Variety (cybernetics)Session (web analytics)Cognitive psychologyContext (language use)Test (assessment)Knowledge managementProcess (engineering)Function (engineering)Task (project management)Knowledge acquisitionComputer science

摘要: Knowledge acquisition and change has long been argued to progress through sequential, qualitatively different developmental stages. Mounting evidence, in the form of performance variability on tasks balancing micro-domain, suggests that this explanation is not sufficient. This study employed two experiments using a balance beam task examined three disparate manipulations: feedback, symmetry, frequency variety beams. Experiment I looked specifically at how varies as function whether feedback was allowed or visual symmetry cues were present. Findings experiment indicate access plays role performance. II considered impact distribution beam-variety. The findings inconclusive, both range types beams used varied between groups. Nevertheless, results showed specific experience during training sessions resulted better with same type subsequent test session. Acknowledgments would like thank my committee: Heidi Kloos, Peter Chiu, Rhonda Brown, for all time invested effort expended bringing document completion. line data required considerable exploration. Heidi’s patience exploratory process proved invaluable. also Adrienne Frazier her extensive efforts collection manipulation presented herein.

参考文章(18)
Leo van Maanen, Pieter Been, Klaas Sijtsma, The Linear Logistic Test Model and heterogeneity of cognitive strategies Springer Berlin Heidelberg. pp. 267- 287 ,(1989) , 10.1007/978-3-642-83943-6_17
Tony J Simon, Graeme S Halford, Developing Cognitive Competence : New Approaches To Process Modeling Psychology Press. ,(2015) , 10.4324/9781315785271
Pamela Thibodeau Hardiman, Alexander Pollatsek, Arnold D. Well, Learning to Understand the Balance Beam Cognition and Instruction. ,vol. 3, pp. 63- 86 ,(1986) , 10.1207/S1532690XCI0301_3
Annette Karmiloff-Smith, Bärbel Inhelder, If you want to get ahead, get a theory☆ Cognition. ,vol. 3, pp. 195- 212 ,(1974) , 10.1016/0010-0277(74)90008-0
Carol Smith, Susan Carey, Marianne Wiser, On differentiation: a case study of the development of the concepts of size, weight, and density. Cognition. ,vol. 21, pp. 177- 237 ,(1985) , 10.1016/0010-0277(85)90025-3
Robert S Siegler, Zhe Chen, Development of Rules and Strategies: Balancing the Old and the New. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology. ,vol. 81, pp. 446- 457 ,(2002) , 10.1006/JECP.2002.2666
Robert S. Siegler, Sidney Strauss, Iris Levin, Developmental Sequences within and between Concepts. Monographs of The Society for Research in Child Development. ,vol. 46, pp. 1- 84 ,(1981) , 10.2307/1165995
Sylvie Normandeau, Serge Larivée, Jean-Luc Roulin, François Longeot, The balance-scale dilemma: either the subject or the experimenter muddles through. Journal of Genetic Psychology. ,vol. 150, pp. 237- 249 ,(1989) , 10.1080/00221325.1989.9914594
Brenda R.J Jansen, Han L.J van der Maas, The development of children's rule use on the balance scale task. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology. ,vol. 81, pp. 383- 416 ,(2002) , 10.1006/JECP.2002.2664
Friedrich Wilkening, Norman H. Anderson, Comparison of two rule-assessment methodologies for studying cognitive development and knowledge structure. Psychological Bulletin. ,vol. 92, pp. 215- 237 ,(1982) , 10.1037/0033-2909.92.1.215