Using affective knowledge to generate and validate a set of emotion-related, action words

作者: Emma Portch , Jelena Havelka , Charity Brown , Roger Giner-Sorolla

DOI: 10.7717/PEERJ.1100

关键词: Context (language use)Meaning (existential)Set (psychology)Natural language processingArtificial intelligenceVerbFeelingPsychologySentenceAssociation (psychology)Action (philosophy)Cognitive psychology

摘要: Emotion concepts are built through situated experience. Abstract word meaning is grounded in this affective knowledge, giving words the potential to evoke emotional feelings and reactions (e.g., Vigliocco et al., 2009). In present work we explore whether differ extent which they ‘specific’ knowledge. Using a categorical approach, an ‘context’ created, it possible assess proportionally activate knowledge relevant different states ‘sadness’, ‘anger’, Stevenson, Mikels & James, 2007a). We argue that method may be particularly effective when assessing of action Schacht Sommer, study 1 use constrained feature generation task derive set participants associated with six, basic (see full list Appendix S1). Generation frequencies were taken indicate likelihood would state had been paired. 2 rating was used strength association between six most frequently generated, or ‘typical’, corresponding emotion labels. Participants presented series sentences, (typical atypical) labels paired e.g., “If you feeling ‘sad’ how likely act following way?” … ‘cry.’ Findings suggest typical associations robust. always gave higher ratings vs. atypical label pairings, even (a) direction manipulated (the verb appeared first sentence), (b) behaviours performed by rater themselves, others. Our findings emotion-related vary for states. When measuring grounding, then appropriate conjunction unimodal measures, ‘magnitude’ Newcombe 2012). Towards aim provide words, accompanied frequency data, show strongly each evokes

参考文章(69)
Lawrence W Barsalou, Ava Santos, W Kyle Simmons, Christine D Wilson, None, Language and simulation in conceptual processing Oxford University Press. ,(2008) , 10.1093/ACPROF:OSO/9780199217274.003.0013
Marina Palazova, Werner Sommer, Annekathrin Schacht, Interplay of emotional valence and concreteness in word processing: An event-related potential study with verbs Brain and Language. ,vol. 125, pp. 264- 271 ,(2013) , 10.1016/J.BANDL.2013.02.008
Paul Ekman, An argument for basic emotions Cognition & Emotion. ,vol. 6, pp. 169- 200 ,(1992) , 10.1080/02699939208411068
David Vinson, Marta Ponari, Gabriella Vigliocco, How does emotional content affect lexical processing Cognition & Emotion. ,vol. 28, pp. 737- 746 ,(2014) , 10.1080/02699931.2013.851068
Stavroula-Thaleia Kousta, Gabriella Vigliocco, David P. Vinson, Mark Andrews, Elena Del Campo, The representation of abstract words: why emotion matters Journal of Experimental Psychology: General. ,vol. 140, pp. 14- 34 ,(2011) , 10.1037/A0021446
Paula J. Schwanenflugel, Edward J. Shoben, Differential Context Effects in the Comprehension of Abstract and Concrete Verbal Materials Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition. ,vol. 9, pp. 82- 102 ,(1983) , 10.1037/0278-7393.9.1.82
Kristen A. Lindquist, Language is Powerful Emotion Review. ,vol. 1, pp. 16- 18 ,(2009) , 10.1177/1754073908097177
Olaf Hauk, Ingrid Johnsrude, Friedemann Pulvermüller, Somatotopic Representation of Action Words in Human Motor and Premotor Cortex Neuron. ,vol. 41, pp. 301- 307 ,(2004) , 10.1016/S0896-6273(03)00838-9
Keith A. Hutchison, David A. Balota, James H. Neely, Michael J. Cortese, Emily R. Cohen-Shikora, Chi-Shing Tse, Melvin J. Yap, Jesse J. Bengson, Dale Niemeyer, Erin Buchanan, The semantic priming project Behavior Research Methods. ,vol. 45, pp. 1099- 1114 ,(2013) , 10.3758/S13428-012-0304-Z