The effect of limited visibility on vigilance behaviour and speed of predator detection: implications for the conservation of granivorous passerines

作者: MJ Whittingham , Simon James Butler , JL Quinn , Will Cresswell , None

DOI: 10.1111/J.0030-1299.2004.13132.X

关键词: SparrowhawkForagingAccipiterPredationBiologyPredatorVigilance (behavioural ecology)Wildlife conservationFringillaEcology

摘要: Foraging animals frequently change their pattern of vigilance when they move from a patch with clear view to one relatively obstructed view. This has been widely interpreted as compensation for reduced ability detect approaching predators in habitats. We test the extent which changes may compensate effect visibility on an animal's predators. measured vigilance, foraging and speed predator-response behaviours lone chaffinches Fringilla coelebs that fed seeds (800 per m2) scattered artificial stubble habitats (with either surroundings or view). On both treatments, individuals more rapid head-up rates responded quickly flying model sparrowhawk Accipiter nisus (P=0.04); did shorter food-search times (P=0.02). However, neither rate nor period varied obstruction. Based research previously published using this system, we suggest is because are constrained increase doing so largely determined by individually efficiency. Instead increased duration periods 13% visually treatment (long stubble) peck were lower. Despite presumed attempt visibility, had no response time fast-moving predator our experiment birds 24% slower respond long stubble. Rather than being maladaptive, increasing have related enhanced detection other types, example stalkers. Our results implications conservation wild granivorous birds. They support agroeconomic decisions affect micro-habitat structure over large scale could predation risk, habitat choice status

参考文章(32)
G. M. Tucker, Caroline M. Socha, Melanie F. Heath, Birds in Europe : their conservation status BirdLife International. ,(1994)
Conspicuous Coloration in Male Birds is Favoured by Predation in Some Species and Disfavoured in Others Proceedings of The Royal Society B: Biological Sciences. ,vol. 253, pp. 143- 146 ,(1993) , 10.1098/RSPB.1993.0094
R.J. Fuller, R.D. Gregory, D.W. Gibbons, J.H. Marchant, J.D. Wilson, S.R. Baillie, N. Carter, Population declines and range contractions among lowland farmland birds in Britain Conservation Biology. ,vol. 9, pp. 1425- 1441 ,(1995) , 10.1046/J.1523-1739.1995.09061425.X
John M. McNamara, Alasdair I. Houston, Evolutionarily stable levels of vigilance as a function of group size Animal Behaviour. ,vol. 43, pp. 641- 658 ,(1992) , 10.1016/S0003-3472(05)81023-1
D. Moorcroft, M. J. Whittingham, R. B. Bradbury, J. D. Wilson, The selection of stubble fields by wintering granivorous birds reflects vegetation cover and food abundance Journal of Applied Ecology. ,vol. 39, pp. 535- 547 ,(2002) , 10.1046/J.1365-2664.2002.00730.X
John Lazarus, Michelle Symonds, Contrasting effects of protective and obstructive cover on avian vigilance Animal Behaviour. ,vol. 43, pp. 519- 521 ,(1992) , 10.1016/S0003-3472(05)80110-1
Isabelle Coolen, Luc-Alain Giraldeau, Myriam Lavoie, Head position as an indicator of producer and scrounger tactics in a ground-feeding bird Animal Behaviour. ,vol. 61, pp. 895- 903 ,(2001) , 10.1006/ANBE.2000.1678
Michael W Pienkowski, Deborah J Pain, None, Farming and birds in Europe: the common agricultural policy and its implications for bird conservation Journal of Animal Ecology. ,vol. 66, pp. 917- ,(1997) , 10.2307/6012
Steven L. Lima, Peter A. Bednekoff, Back to the basics of antipredatory vigilance: can nonvigilant animals detect attack? Animal Behaviour. ,vol. 58, pp. 537- 543 ,(1999) , 10.1006/ANBE.1999.1182