Why are most mutations recessive

作者: Vidyanand Nanjundiah

DOI: 10.1007/BF02927924

关键词: Wild typePhenotypeBiologyAlleleNatural selectionDominance (genetics)Evolution of dominanceWrightGenetics

摘要: It is a long-standing observation that most mutations are recessive. That is, they do not lead to visible phenotypic effects when in heterozygous combination with the wild-type allele. The reason for this has long been debated. Fisher (1930) attributed observed dominance of wild type action natural selection at modifier loci. Wright (1929) on other hand asserted did have selective functionper se, but was more-or-less automatic offshoot genetic regulatory mechanisms. present essay discusses these explanations from contemporary standpoint and suggests neither likely be valid exclusively. In particular, even physiology appears offer sufficient explanation, evolution cannot ruled out.

参考文章(40)
William B. Provine, The R. A. Fisher—Sewall Wright Controversy Springer Netherlands. pp. 201- 229 ,(1992) , 10.1007/978-94-011-2856-8_8
Lewis Wolpert, Chapter 6 Positional Information and Pattern Formation Current Topics in Developmental Biology. ,vol. 6, pp. 183- 224 ,(1971) , 10.1016/S0070-2153(08)60641-9
J. A. Sved, O. Mayo, The Evolution of Dominance The evolution of dominance.. pp. 289- 316 ,(1970) , 10.1007/978-3-642-46244-3_9
Lewis Wolpert, Positional Information and Pattern Formation. Current Topics in Developmental Biology. ,vol. 117, pp. 597- 608 ,(2016) , 10.1016/BS.CTDB.2015.11.008
Role of cryptic genes in microbial evolution. Molecular Biology and Evolution. ,vol. 1, pp. 109- 124 ,(1983) , 10.1093/OXFORDJOURNALS.MOLBEV.A040300