How blind is blind review
作者： Stephen J. Ceci , Douglas Peters
DOI: 10.1037/0003-066X.39.12.1491
关键词: Scientific communication 、 Psychology 、 Peer evaluation 、 Multimedia
摘要:
sci-hub.st 参考文章(12)
Duncan Lindsey, The scientific publication system in social science ,(1978)
Julie A. Rowney, Thomas J. Zenisek, Manuscript characteristics influencing reviewers' decisions. Canadian Psychology. ,vol. 21, pp. 17- 21 ,(1980) , 10.1037/H0081144
Robert K. Adair, A physics editor comments on Peters and Ceci's peer-review study Behavioral and Brain Sciences. ,vol. 5, pp. 196- 196 ,(1982) , 10.1017/S0140525X00011195
David Lazarus, Interreferee agreement and acceptance rates in physics Behavioral and Brain Sciences. ,vol. 5, pp. 219- 219 ,(1982) , 10.1017/S0140525X00011468
Aaron Rosenblatt, Stuart A. Kirk, Recognition of Authors in Blind Review of Manuscripts Journal of Social Service Research. ,vol. 3, pp. 383- 394 ,(1981) , 10.1300/J079V03N04_04
James V. Bradley, Pernicious publication practices Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society. ,vol. 18, pp. 31- 34 ,(1981) , 10.3758/BF03333562
Michael J. Mahoney, Publication, politics, and scientific progress Behavioral and Brain Sciences. ,vol. 5, pp. 220- 221 ,(1982) , 10.1017/S0140525X00011481
Garth J. Thomas, Perhaps it was right to reject the resubmitted manuscripts Behavioral and Brain Sciences. ,vol. 5, pp. 240- 240 ,(1982) , 10.1017/S0140525X00011675
Michael J. A. Howe, Peer reviewing: Improve or be rejected Behavioral and Brain Sciences. ,vol. 5, pp. 218- 219 ,(1982) , 10.1017/S0140525X00011456
Douglas P. Peters, Stephen J. Ceci, Peer-review practices of psychological journals: The fate of published articles, submitted again Behavioral and Brain Sciences. ,vol. 5, pp. 187- 195 ,(1982) , 10.1017/S0140525X00011183