What US judges know and believe about eyewitness testimony
作者： Richard A. Wise , Martin A. Safer
DOI: 10.1002/ACP.993
关键词: Eyewitness testimony 、 Suicide prevention 、 Legal testimony 、 Justice (ethics) 、 Injury control 、 Human factors and ergonomics 、 Social psychology 、 Knowledge level 、 Poison control 、 Psychology
摘要: In a survey, 160 US judges indicated their knowledge and beliefs about eyewitness testimony. Although correct on some issues, were often wrong important issues such as whether at trial confidence is good indicator of accuracy, if jurors can distinguish accurate from inaccurate witnesses. Increased was associated with: willingness to permit legal safeguards, including expert testimony trial; belief that have limited factors; reluctance convict defendants solely testimony; more estimate the extent which wrongful convictions result error; need training. Additional training factors procedures affect accuracy may help reduce number convictions. Copyright © 2004 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
safetylit.org
sci-hub.se 参考文章(23)
Steven D. Penrod, Brian Cutler, Preventing Mistaken Convictions in Eyewitness Identification Trials Psychology and Law. pp. 89- 118 ,(1999) , 10.1007/978-1-4615-4891-1_4
Rogers Elliott, Expert testimony about eyewitness identification Law and Human Behavior. ,vol. 17, pp. 423- 437 ,(1993) , 10.1007/BF01044376
Peter Neufeld, Barry Scheck, Jim Dwyer, Actual Innocence : Five Days to Execution and Other Dispatches from the Wrongly Convicted Doubleday. ,(2000)
Siegfried L Sporer, Roy S Malpass, Guenter Koehnken, Psychological issues in eyewitness identification. Psychology Press. ,(1996) , 10.4324/9781315821023
Siegfried Ludwig Sporer, Steven Penrod, Don Read, Brian Cutler, CHOOSING, CONFIDENCE, AND ACCURACY : A META-ANALYSIS OF THE CONFIDENCE-ACCURACY RELATION IN EYEWITNESS IDENTIFICATION STUDIES Psychological Bulletin. ,vol. 118, pp. 315- 327 ,(1995) , 10.1037/0033-2909.118.3.315
Brad E. Bell, Elizabeth F. Loftus, Trivial persuasion in the courtroom: the power of (a few) minor details. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. ,vol. 56, pp. 669- 679 ,(1989) , 10.1037/0022-3514.56.5.669
Brian L. Cutler, Steven D. Penrod, Hedy Red Dexter, Juror Sensitivity to Eyewitness Identification Evidence Law and Human Behavior. ,vol. 14, pp. 185- 191 ,(1990) , 10.1007/BF01062972
John C. Brigham, Melissa P. WolfsKeil, Opinions of attorneys and law enforcement personnel on the accuracy of eyewitness identifications. Law and Human Behavior. ,vol. 7, pp. 337- 349 ,(1983) , 10.1007/BF01044736
Brian L. Cutler, Steven D. Penrod, Hedy R. Dexter, The eyewitness, the expert psychologist, and the jury Law and Human Behavior. ,vol. 13, pp. 311- 332 ,(1989) , 10.1007/BF01067032
John C. Brigham, Robert K. Bothwell, The ability of prospective jurors to estimate the accuracy of eyewitness identifications Law and Human Behavior. ,vol. 7, pp. 19- 30 ,(1983) , 10.1007/BF01045284