'More crop per drop': how to make it acceptable for farmers?

作者: Delphine Luquet , Alain Vidal , Martin Smith , Jean Dauzat

DOI: 10.1016/J.AGWAT.2005.01.011

关键词: IrrigationDrip irrigationDeficit irrigationSurface irrigationAgricultural scienceBusinessWater scarcityWater pricingEnvironmental engineeringIrrigation managementWater conservation

摘要: Abstract In countries facing water scarcity, governmental agencies try to transfer this constraint farmers, e.g. by encouraging them shift from traditional localized irrigation methods save water. However, shortage is often much less a problem for farmers than soil limitations, their objective being mostly maximize income per cultivated area (US$ hectare rather cubic meter of water). This discrepancy can only be solved if governments find ways ‘transfer’ through economic incentives such as pricing and/or subsidies. The aim study was address the question how match interest both managers and farmers. We aimed particularly at evaluating whether shifting drip relevant way increase farmer's income. Our analysis based on interactive impacts among economic, environmental, technical methodological parameters net productivity two crops. focused case Turkey considering crops with contrasted gross productivity, tomato cotton, characterized partial vegetation cover during large part crop cycle. A 3D energy balance model applied showing that transpiration increased up 10% when furrow irrigation. These results were used correct maximal evapotranspiration (ET m ), estimated simple “crop coefficient” ( K c ) method, then enhance estimation suggest share common in adopting tomato. Inversely, interests divergence may low/medium value cotton; combination between subsidies could agreement, but it would require equipment least 40%, low tariffs, 60%, high make acceptable. approach appeared generic enough other or environmental conditions, modernize harmonizing constraints faced

参考文章(15)
Richard G. Allen, Dirk Raes, Martin Smith, Luis S. Pereira, Crop evapotranspiration : guidelines for computing crop water requirements FAO Irrigation and Drainage Paper (FAO). ,(1998)
D. Molden, W. Kloezen, C. de Fraiture, R. Sakthivadivel, C. Perry, Indicators for comparing performance of irrigated agricultural systems. Research Papers in Economics. ,(1998)
Ariel Dinar, A. Subramanian, Water Pricing Experiences Research Papers in Economics. ,(1997)
Delphine Luquet, Agnès Bégué, Alain Vidal, Pascal Clouvel, Jean Dauzat, Albert Olioso, XF Gu, Yanzhu Tao, None, Using multidirectional thermography to characterize water status of cotton Remote Sensing of Environment. ,vol. 84, pp. 411- 421 ,(2003) , 10.1016/S0034-4257(02)00131-1
M.S. Moran, Irrigation management in Arizona using satellites and airplanes Irrigation Science. ,vol. 15, pp. 35- 44 ,(1994) , 10.1007/BF00187793
O Cetin, L Bilgel, Effects of different irrigation methods on shedding and yield of cotton Agricultural Water Management. ,vol. 54, pp. 1- 15 ,(2002) , 10.1016/S0378-3774(01)00138-X
Ya Ling Li, Cecilia Stanghellini, Hugo Challa, Response of tomato plants to a step-change in root-zone salinity under two different transpiration regimes Scientia Horticulturae. ,vol. 93, pp. 267- 279 ,(2002) , 10.1016/S0304-4238(01)00329-6
Fekadu Yohannes, Teshome Tadesse, Effect of drip and furrow irrigation and plant spacing on yield of tomato at Dire Dawa, Ethiopia Agricultural Water Management. ,vol. 35, pp. 201- 207 ,(1998) , 10.1016/S0378-3774(97)00039-5
Johannes Scholberg, Brian L. McNeal, James W. Jones, Kenneth J. Boote, Craig D. Stanley, Thomas A. Obreza, Growth and Canopy Characteristics of Field-Grown Tomato Agronomy Journal. ,vol. 92, pp. 152- 159 ,(2000) , 10.2134/AGRONJ2000.921152X