Assessing visual activities of daily living in the visually impaired

作者: Keziah Latham , Claire Usherwood

DOI: 10.1111/J.1475-1313.2009.00693.X

关键词: Observer ratingReading (process)Quality of life (healthcare)Vision testTask (project management)Visual impairmentDevelopmental psychologyPsychologyAudiologyActivities of daily livingVisually impaired

摘要: Purpose: Visual function assessment questionnaires ask people to rate the difficulty they have performing visual activities of daily living (ADLs). This study examines relationship between selfreported and actual performance in such ADLs. Methods: Twenty four subjects with established bilateral impairment initially self-reported their 4 ADLs (reading newsprint, reading medicine labels, identifying coins entering a PIN). Subjects variants these was then assessed by measuring time taken; an observer rating performance; subject perceived each specific task. Clinical parameters were also assessed. Results: Varying ADL task changed how well correlated difficulty. function, completion all significantly difficulty, explaining up 69% variance However, despite replicating as closely possible clinical environment clinic tasks rated being less than initial real-world Conclusions: The variant used is important when assessing functional directly. Timed observer-rated methods can be appropriate for vision. In this small study, disconnect or suggests that not only factor influencing self-report, responses should interpreted light.

参考文章(47)
M Trukolo-Ilic, D B Elliott, A Plotkin, P Bevers, J G Strong, R Pace, Demographic characteristics of the vision-disabled elderly. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science. ,vol. 38, pp. 2566- 2575 ,(1997)
Catey Bunce, Richard Wormald, Leading causes of certification for blindness and partial sight in England & Wales BMC Public Health. ,vol. 6, pp. 58- 58 ,(2006) , 10.1186/1471-2458-6-58
Alan W. Johnston, Anthony D. Heyes, Sharon A. Haymes, The development of the Melbourne low-vision ADL index: a measure of vision disability. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science. ,vol. 42, pp. 1215- 1225 ,(2001)
Joan A. Stelmack, Joan A. Stelmack, Robert W. Massof, Thomas R. Stelmack, Thomas R. Stelmack, Measuring low-vision rehabilitation outcomes with the NEI VFQ-25 Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science. ,vol. 43, pp. 2859- 2868 ,(2002)
Keziah Latham Petre, Richard A. Armstrong, Mark T. Benson, N. Andrew Frost, Charlotte A. Hazel, Charlotte A. Hazel, Visual function and subjective quality of life compared in subjects with acquired macular disease. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science. ,vol. 41, pp. 1309- 1315 ,(2000)
Karen Bandeen-Roche, Susan M. Friedman, Linda P. Fried, Sheila K. West, Gary S. Rubin, Beatrix Munoz, Characteristics of discrepancies between self-reported visual function and measured reading speed Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science. ,vol. 40, pp. 858- 864 ,(1999)
M. A. Bullimore, D. B. Elliott, I. L. Bailey, Improving the reliability of the Pelli-Robson contrast sensitivity test Clinical vision sciences. ,vol. 6, pp. 471- 475 ,(1991)
J.P. Szlyk, A. Arditi, P. Coffey Bucci, D. Laderman, Self-Report in Functional Assessment of Low Vision. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness. ,vol. 84, pp. 61- 66 ,(1990) , 10.1177/0145482X9008400202