Clinical research in cancer palliative care: a metaresearch analysis

作者: Marie Vinches , Anouk Neven , Laurène Fenwarth , Mitsumi Terada , Giovanna Rossi

DOI: 10.1136/BMJSPCARE-2019-002086

关键词: Family medicineObservational studyMedicineQuality of life (healthcare)CancerPalliative careCancer palliative careClinical researchPhysical functionAdverse effect

摘要: Objective This metaresearch of the clinicaltrials.gov database aims to evaluate how clinical research on palliative care is conducted within setting advanced cancer. Methods Clinicaltrials.gov was searched identify registered studies recruiting patients with cancer, and investigating issues relevant care. The European Organisation for Research Treatment Cancer QLQ-C15-PAL (Quality Life in cancer patients) questionnaire taken into account define domains interest. Studies cancer-directed therapy, management treatment-related adverse events diagnostic tests were excluded. Publication status crosschecked using PubMed. Results Of 3950 identified studies, 514 included. most frequent reason exclusion therapy (2491). In 2007–2012, 161 versus 245 2013–2018. Included interventional (84%) or observational (16%). Most monocentric (60%), sponsored by academia (79%), North America (57%) Europe (25%). Seventy-nine per cent evaluated a heterogeneous population (>1 tumour type). Interventional frequently investigated systemic drugs (34%), behavioural interventions (29%) procedures pain (24%). Pain, quality life physical function studied (188, 95 52 respectively). applied primary outcome measures efficacy/symptom control (61%), (14%) feasibility (12%). Only 16% closed had published results Conclusions Our study describes landscape address Albeit observed increase number over last decade, generalisation brought existing trials limited due methodological lack reporting. A greater effort needed improve that supports evidence-based

参考文章(41)
John P. A. Ioannidis, Daniele Fanelli, Debbie Drake Dunne, Steven N. Goodman, Meta-research: Evaluation and Improvement of Research Methods and Practices PLOS Biology. ,vol. 13, pp. e1002264- 7 ,(2015) , 10.1371/JOURNAL.PBIO.1002264
Kathy L. Hudson, Francis S. Collins, Sharing and Reporting the Results of Clinical Trials JAMA. ,vol. 313, pp. 355- 356 ,(2015) , 10.1001/JAMA.2014.10716
Joseph S. Ross, Gregory K. Mulvey, Elizabeth M. Hines, Steven E. Nissen, Harlan M. Krumholz, Trial Publication after Registration in ClinicalTrials.Gov: A Cross-Sectional Analysis PLoS Medicine. ,vol. 6, pp. e1000144- ,(2009) , 10.1371/JOURNAL.PMED.1000144
Amy P. Abernethy, Warren H. Capell, Noreen M. Aziz, Christine Ritchie, Maryjo Prince-Paul, Rachael E. Bennett, Jean S. Kutner, Ethical Conduct of Palliative Care Research: Enhancing Communication Between Investigators and Institutional Review Boards Journal of Pain and Symptom Management. ,vol. 48, pp. 1211- 1221 ,(2014) , 10.1016/J.JPAINSYMMAN.2014.05.005
Jay R Thomas, Charles F von Gunten, Clinical management of dyspnoea Lancet Oncology. ,vol. 3, pp. 223- 228 ,(2002) , 10.1016/S1470-2045(02)00713-1
M. Joseph Sirgy, Alex C. Michalos, Abbott L. Ferriss, Richard A. Easterlin, Donald Patrick, William Pavot, The quality-of-life (QOL) research movement : Past, present, and future Social Indicators Research. ,vol. 76, pp. 343- 466 ,(2006) , 10.1007/S11205-005-2877-8
Fiona Graham, David Clark, The changing model of palliative care Medicine. ,vol. 36, pp. 64- 66 ,(2008) , 10.1016/J.MPMED.2007.11.009
D. Schrijvers, N.I. Cherny, ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines on palliative care: advanced care planning. Annals of Oncology. ,vol. 25, ,(2014) , 10.1093/ANNONC/MDU241
David Hui, Isabella Glitza, Gary Chisholm, Sriram Yennu, Eduardo Bruera, Attrition rates, reasons, and predictive factors in supportive care and palliative oncology clinical trials. Cancer. ,vol. 119, pp. 1098- 1105 ,(2013) , 10.1002/CNCR.27854
M. Staquet, R. Berzon, D. Osoba, D. Machin, Guidelines for reporting results of quality of life assessments in clinical trials. Quality of Life Research. ,vol. 5, pp. 496- 502 ,(1996) , 10.1007/BF00540022