Digging for the truth: A combined method to analyze the literature on stream daylighting

摘要: Abstract To date, review articles examining stream daylighting (de-culverting buried streams) are limited in scope, report on only a fraction of available publications, and focus publications’ explicit (manifest) content rather than their underlying constructs (latent content). This combines the methods systematic literature reviews inductive analysis to better understand scope nature daylighting. The study investigates four themes: disciplines, terminologies, definitions, case studies interconnections covers all relevant English-language sources since 1992 through 2018. results reveal three findings with implications for future research: 1) there is dearth that tackle crucial contemporary challenges like climate change delve into complex connections among socio-cultural, physical planning, environmental, economic dimensions daylighting, such as socio-environmental justice, architecture, urban design; 2) terminology inconsistent clear definition absent; 3) Some important cases overlooked, Zurich’s (Switzerland) city-wide initiative Riyadh’s (Saudi Arabia) first arid initiative. inclusion impacts perception expands this practice.