作者: Timothy S. Lesar , Ernest R. Anderson , John Fields , Deborah Saine , Jill Gregoire
DOI: 10.1016/S1553-7250(07)33009-2
关键词: Medicine 、 Health care 、 Intensive care 、 Medication error 、 New england 、 Nursing 、 Quality management
摘要: Article-at-a-Glance Background Quality improvement collaboratives (QICs) are a widely applied strategy for implementing change in health care organizations. Alternative collaborative methodologies were compared to gain insight into the elements important QIC success. Methods A modified version of previously described evaluation tool was used assess methods and characteristics Medication Error Prevention Initiative (MEPI) compare MEPI with two other long-term ongoing QICs—the Vermont-Oxford Network's Neonatal Intensive Care Northern New England Cardiovascular Disease Study Group, shorter-term Breakthrough Series QICs Institute Healthcare Improvement (IHI). Results The assessment useful framework comparison. differed scope topic, team members, method learning about making improvements. Conclusions Long-term such as those by may be particularly applicable when address broad, complex, comprehensive, or organizationwide needs.