Radiation Exposure and Pregnancy: When Should We Be Concerned?

作者: Cynthia H. McCollough , Beth A. Schueler , Thomas D. Atwell , Natalie N. Braun , Dawn M. Regner

DOI: 10.1148/RG.274065149

关键词: Gestational ageRadiation protectionRelative biological effectivenessObstetrics and gynaecologyFetusObstetricsMedicineIntrauterine growth restrictionGynecologyRadiological weaponPregnancy

摘要: The potential biological effects of in utero radiation exposure a developing fetus include prenatal death, intrauterine growth restriction, small head size, mental retardation, organ malformation, and childhood cancer. risk each effect depends on the gestational age at time exposure, fetal cellular repair mechanisms, absorbed dose level. A comparison between levels associated with these risks estimated doses from typical radiologic examinations lends support to conclusion that are minimal and, therefore, nuclear medicine may provide significant diagnostic information should not be withheld pregnant women. latter position is advocated by International Commission Radiological Protection, National Council Radiation American College Radiology, Obstetrics Gynecology. However, although small, it important ensure kept as low reasonably achievable.

参考文章(27)
D P Miller, K S Toppenberg, D A Hill, Safety of radiographic imaging during pregnancy. American Family Physician. ,vol. 59, pp. 1813- 1820 ,(1999)
Edward W. Webster, A primer on low-level ionizing radiation and its biological effects : A report of the Biological Effects Committee American Association of Physicists in Medicine Published for the American Association of Physicists in Medicine by the American Institute of Physics. ,(1986)
Edward L. Nickoloff, Philip O. Alderson, Radiation exposures to patients from CT: reality, public perception, and policy. American Journal of Roentgenology. ,vol. 177, pp. 285- 287 ,(2001) , 10.2214/AJR.177.2.1770285
Robert A. Parry, Sharon A. Glaze, Benjamin R. Archer, The AAPM/RSNA physics tutorial for residents. Typical patient radiation doses in diagnostic radiology. Radiographics. ,vol. 19, pp. 1289- 1302 ,(1999) , 10.1148/RADIOGRAPHICS.19.5.G99SE211289
Merton Honeyman, John T. Flannery, Elizabeth B. Harvey, John D. Boice, Prenatal X-Ray Exposure and Childhood Cancer in Twins New England Journal of Medicine. ,vol. 312, pp. 541- 545 ,(1985) , 10.1056/NEJM198502283120903
David H. Forsted, CT of pregnant women for urinary tract calculi, pulmonary thromboembolism, and acute appendicitis. American Journal of Roentgenology. ,vol. 178, pp. 1285- 1285 ,(2002) , 10.2214/AJR.178.5.1781285
Harold M. Swartz, Hazards of Radiation Exposure for Pregnant Women JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association. ,vol. 239, pp. 1907- 1908 ,(1978) , 10.1001/JAMA.1978.03280450079035
T. Ripollés, J. Errando, M. Agramunt, M.-J. Martínez, Ureteral colic: US versus CT. Abdominal Imaging. ,vol. 29, pp. 263- 266 ,(2004) , 10.1007/S00261-003-0098-7
Jay H. Ryu, Stephen J. Swensen, Eric J. Olson, Patricia A. Pellikka, Diagnosis of Pulmonary Embolism With Use of Computed Tomographic Angiography Cameron Symposium on Barrett Esophagus and GERD. ,vol. 76, pp. 59- 65 ,(2001) , 10.4065/76.1.59