Comparison of treatment effort for immunocontraceptive vaccines and surgical sterilization in deer

作者: Charles S. Evans , Anthony J. DeNicola , Robert J. Warren

DOI: 10.1002/WSB.684

关键词: FertilityAnimal scienceSterilization (medicine)WildlifeSurgical sterilizationMedicineDemography

摘要: Fertility control via immunocontraceptive vaccines or surgical sterilization often is considered for the management of deer populations in urban–suburban communities United States. Immunocontraceptive have been approved hand-injection and it has suggested dart-injection would be more efficient because added effort associated with live capture. Vaccines currently exhibit nonresponder rates require booster shots following years to prolong efficacy, whereas 100% efficacy entirety life individual. However, less additional person-hours required during first year a project. Therefore, we recorded capture process (capture, search, handling) treating winter 2013, 2014, 2015 at sites North Carolina, California, Maryland, New York, Virginia, USA. These data were 335 across 6 communities. Capture consisted pursuit (i.e., acquire shot opportunities) search handling SH locate anesthetized vaccinate individual). On average, 91% 9% however, considering lower retreatment requirements vaccines, may long-term Deer behavior varied our study affected effort—more approachable treat fertility control. future research should include modelling behavior, effort, over long term identify which situations are best suited application vaccine versus treatments areas where lethal impractical. © 2016 The Wildlife Society.

参考文章(11)
Brent A. Rudolph, William F. Porter, H. Brian Underwood, Evaluating immunocontraception for managing suburban white-tailed deer in Irondequoit, New York Journal of Wildlife Management. ,vol. 64, pp. 463- 473 ,(2000) , 10.2307/3803244
Giovanna Massei, Dave Cowan, Fertility control to mitigate human-wildlife conflicts: a review Wildlife Research. ,vol. 41, pp. 1- 21 ,(2014) , 10.1071/WR13141
Allen T. Rutberg, Ricky E. Naugle, John W. Turner, Mark A. Fraker, Douglas R. Flanagan, Field testing of single-administration porcine zona pellucida contraceptive vaccines in white-tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus) Wildlife Research. ,vol. 40, pp. 281- 288 ,(2013) , 10.1071/WR12117
John W. Turner, Allen T. Rutberg, FROM THE PENS TO THE FIELD: REAL-WORLD WILDLIFE CONTRACEPTION Journal of Zoo and Wildlife Medicine. ,vol. 44, pp. S102- S110 ,(2013) , 10.1638/1042-7260-44.4S.S102
Lowell A. Miller, Kathleen A. Fagerstone, Douglas C. Eckery, TWENTY YEARS OF IMMUNOCONTRACEPTIVE RESEARCH: LESSONS LEARNED Journal of Zoo and Wildlife Medicine. ,vol. 44, pp. S84- S96 ,(2013) , 10.1638/1042-7260-44.4S.S84
James P. Gionfriddo, Anthony J. Denicola, Lowell A. Miller, Kathleen A. Fagerstone, Health effects of GnRH immunocontraception of wild white-tailed deer in New Jersey† Wildlife Society Bulletin. ,vol. 35, pp. 149- 160 ,(2011) , 10.1002/WSB.17
Robert A. MacLean, Nancy E. Mathews, Daniel M. Grove, Elizabeth S. Frank, Joanne Paul-Murphy, SURGICAL TECHNIQUE FOR TUBAL LIGATION IN WHITE‐TAILED DEER (ODOCOILEUS VIRGINIANUS) Journal of Zoo and Wildlife Medicine. ,vol. 37, pp. 354- 360 ,(2006) , 10.1638/05-091.1
James P. Gionfriddo, John D. Eisemann, Kevin J. Sullivan, Ronald S. Healey, Lowell A. Miller, Kathleen A. Fagerstone, Richard M. Engeman, Christi A. Yoder, Field test of a single-injection gonadotrophin-releasing hormone immunocontraceptive vaccine in female white-tailed deer Wildlife Research. ,vol. 36, pp. 177- 184 ,(2009) , 10.1071/WR08061
Allen T. Rutberg, Ricky E. Naugle, Frank Verret, SINGLE-TREATMENT PORCINE ZONA PELLUCIDA IMMUNOCONTRACEPTION ASSOCIATED WITH REDUCTION OF A POPULATION OF WHITE-TAILED DEER (ODOCOILEUS VIRGINIANUS) Journal of Zoo and Wildlife Medicine. ,vol. 44, pp. S75- S83 ,(2013) , 10.1638/1042-7260-44.4S.S75
Anthony J. DeNicola, Paul D. Curtis, Jason R. Boulanger, Evan G. Cooch, Sterilization as an alternative deer control technique: a review Human–Wildlife Interactions. ,vol. 6, pp. 273- 282 ,(2012) , 10.26077/Z3GM-0570