Characterizing a scientific elite: the social characteristics of the most highly cited scientists in environmental science and ecology

作者: John N. Parker , Christopher Lortie , Stefano Allesina

DOI: 10.1007/S11192-010-0234-4

关键词: InequalitySubject (philosophy)Social inequalitySocial scienceEliteEnvironmental scienceCitationCitation analysisSocial characteristicsEnvironmental ethicsComputer scienceEcology (disciplines)

摘要: In science, a relatively small pool of researchers garners disproportionally large number citations. Still, very little is known about the social characteristics highly cited scientists. This unfortunate as these wield disproportional impact on their fields, and study scientists can enhance our understanding conditions which foster work, systematic inequalities exist in scientific careers more generally. provides information this understudied subject by examining opinions 0.1% most environmental ecologists. Overall, tend to reflect broader patterns inequality global community. However, while mirror those other elites important ways, they differ others, revealing findings are both novel surprising, perhaps indicating multiple pathways becoming cited.

参考文章(42)
Eugene Garfield, A. E. Cawkell, Of nobel class, women in science, citation classics and other essays ISI Press. ,(1993)
Virgil C. Aldrich, Little Science, Big Science ,(1965)
Joseph C. Hermanowicz, Classifying Universities and Their Departments: A Social World Perspective The Journal of Higher Education. ,vol. 76, pp. 26- 55 ,(2005) , 10.1353/JHE.2005.0005
Thomas S. Kuhn, The essential tension : selected studies in scientific tradition and change Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion. ,vol. 18, pp. 328- ,(1977) , 10.7208/9780226217239
Gerard Pasterkamp, Joris I. Rotmans, Dominique V. P. de Kleijn, Cornelius Borst, Citation frequency: A biased measure of research impact significantly influenced by the geographical origin of research articles Scientometrics. ,vol. 70, pp. 153- 165 ,(2007) , 10.1007/S11192-007-0109-5
M. H. MacRoberts, Barbara R. MacRoberts, Problems of citation analysis Scientometrics. ,vol. 36, pp. 435- 444 ,(1996) , 10.1007/BF02129604
Everett C. Hughes, Warren O. Hagstrom, The scientific community American Sociological Review. ,vol. 31, pp. 112- ,(1966) , 10.2307/2091294
Matthew R.E. Symonds, Neil J. Gemmell, Tamsin L. Braisher, Kylie L. Gorringe, Mark A. Elgar, Gender Differences in Publication Output: Towards an Unbiased Metric of Research Performance PLOS ONE. ,vol. 1, pp. 1- 5 ,(2006) , 10.1371/JOURNAL.PONE.0000127
Stephen J. Sills, Chunyan Song, Innovations in survey research Social Science Computer Review. ,vol. 20, pp. 22- 30 ,(2002) , 10.1177/089443930202000103
M.D. Trifunac, On citation rates in earthquake engineering Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering. ,vol. 26, pp. 1049- 1062 ,(2006) , 10.1016/J.SOILDYN.2006.05.010