Comparison of Magnetic Resonance Imaging with Computed Tomography in the Detection and Characterization of Intracranial Tumors

作者: T. H. Newton , W. M. Kelly , M. Brant-Zawadzki , D. Norman

DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-83123-2_20

关键词: Water concentrationCharacterization (materials science)Image contrastRadiologyHematomaMedicineMagnetic resonance imagingDynamic contrast-enhanced MRIIntravenous contrastComputed tomography

摘要: The rapid development of clinical magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and its recognition as a valuable tool in neurodiagnosis have generated excitement enthusiasm rivalling that associated with the introduction computed tomography (CT) decade ago. Magnetic has several advantages over X-ray CT. multiple physical properties tissue determine image contrast MRI permit superior detection characterization altered tissue. relatively small alterations focal water concentration caused by many brain disorders produce proportionally larger alteration intensity signal than CT signal. Differential sensitivity to resonating protons found other molecular substrates, such fat or hematoma, may yield additional information histologic significance. ability visualize blood vessels provides anatomic landmarks normal patients assumes diagnostic importance presence vascular lesions. Finally, no known biologic hazards, iodinated intravenous agents are not required, bone artifacts eliminated, images be obtained directly any plane.

参考文章(8)
G. N. Holland, R. C. Hawkes, W. S. Moore, Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (nmr) Tomography of the Brain: Coronal and Sagittal Sections Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography. ,vol. 4, pp. 429- 433 ,(1980) , 10.1097/00004728-198008000-00002
M Brant-Zawadzki, J P Badami, C M Mills, D Norman, T H Newton, Primary intracranial tumor imaging: a comparison of magnetic resonance and CT. Radiology. ,vol. 150, pp. 435- 440 ,(1984) , 10.1148/RADIOLOGY.150.2.6691098
L E Crooks, C M Mills, P L Davis, M Brant-Zawadzki, J Hoenninger, M Arakawa, J Watts, L Kaufman, Visualization of cerebral and vascular abnormalities by NMR imaging. The effects of imaging parameters on contrast Radiology. ,vol. 144, pp. 843- 852 ,(1982) , 10.1148/RADIOLOGY.144.4.7111736
F. S. Buonanno, I. L. Pykett, T. J. Brady, P. Black, P. F. J. New, E. P. Richardson, W. S. Hinshaw, M. Goldman, G. Pohost, J. P. Kistler, Clinical relevance of two different nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) approaches to imaging of a low grade astrocytoma. Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography. ,vol. 6, pp. 529- 535 ,(1982) , 10.1097/00004728-198206000-00018
M Brant-Zawadzki, PL Davis, LE Crooks, CM Mills, D Norman, TH Newton, P Sheldon, L Kaufman, NMR demonstration of cerebral abnormalities: comparison with CT American Journal of Roentgenology. ,vol. 140, pp. 847- 854 ,(1983) , 10.2214/AJR.140.5.847
GM Bydder, RE Steiner, IR Young, AS Hall, DJ Thomas, J Marshall, CA Pallis, NJ Legg, Clinical NMR imaging of the brain: 140 cases American Journal of Roentgenology. ,vol. 139, pp. 215- 236 ,(1982) , 10.2214/AJR.139.2.215
IR Young, M Burl, GJ Clarke, AS Hall, T Pasmore, AG Collins, DT Smith, JS Orr, GM Bydder, FH Doyle, RH Greenspan, RE Steiner, Magnetic resonance properties of hydrogen: imaging the posterior fossa American Journal of Roentgenology. ,vol. 137, pp. 895- 901 ,(1981) , 10.2214/AJR.137.5.895
L Crooks, M Arakawa, J Hoenninger, J Watts, R McRee, L Kaufman, P L Davis, A R Margulis, J DeGroot, Nuclear magnetic resonance whole-body imager operating at 3. 5 Kgauss Radiology. ,vol. 143, pp. 169- 174 ,(1982) , 10.1148/RADIOLOGY.143.1.7063722