Motivations for corporate social and environmental reporting: New Zealand evidence

作者: Stevie Dobbs , Chris van Staden

DOI: 10.1108/SAMPJ-08-2015-0070

关键词: Senior managementStakeholder engagementContext (language use)Corporate social responsibilityShareholderContent analysisAccountingPublic relationsSustainabilitySolid line reportingBusiness

摘要: Purpose This paper aims to investigate corporate motivations for voluntarily reporting social and environmental information in New Zealand. The approach used this study also gives the opportunity gain insights into internal systems views of companies allows authors make better judgements intentions undertaking responsibility (CSR) reporting. Design/methodology/approach A survey is then extended match responses with content analysis results actual company reporting. are examined both individually collectively gather more context motivations. Findings The find that community concerns shareholder rights were most important factors influenced companies’ decision report. driving force a sustainability agenda within these usually member senior management. frameworks highly formalised not frequently used, external assurance CSR was lacking there low levels stakeholder engagement. A commitment comprehensive disclosures accepting towards range stakeholders were, therefore, evidence. Research limitations/implications For researchers, value further revising techniques expanding existing research methods area. brings together topics from across literature, including characteristics, systems, engagement, motivation reporting. Practical implications The suggest Zealand currently fully committed likely create impression being concerned about increase legitimacy society. highlight importance having ensure accurate comprehensive. Originality/value The contribute literature by providing current view report or

参考文章(52)
Jan Mouritsen, Rolland Munro, Accountability : power, ethos, and the technologies of managing International Thomson Business Press. ,(1996)
Markus J. Milne, Rob Gray, Sustainability Reporting: Who's Kidding Whom? ,(2002)
PETER M. CLARKSON, MICHAEL B. OVERELL, LARELLE CHAPPLE, Environmental Reporting and its Relation to Corporate Environmental Performance Abacus. ,vol. 47, pp. 27- 60 ,(2011) , 10.1111/J.1467-6281.2011.00330.X
M.R. Mathews, Twenty‐five years of social and environmental accounting research Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal. ,vol. 10, pp. 481- 531 ,(1997) , 10.1108/EUM0000000004417
Rob Gray, Carol A. Adams, Dave Owen, Accounting and accountability : changes and challenges in corporate social and environmental reporting Published in <b>1996</b> in London by Prentice-Hall. ,(1996)
Craig Deegan, Michaela Rankin, John Tobin, An examination of the corporate social and environmental disclosures of BHP from 1983‐1997: A test of legitimacy theory Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal. ,vol. 15, pp. 312- 343 ,(2002) , 10.1108/09513570210435861
Trevor D. Wilmshurst, Geoffrey R. Frost, Corporate environmental reporting: A test of legitimacy theory Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal. ,vol. 13, pp. 10- 26 ,(2000) , 10.1108/09513570010316126
Brendan O’Dwyer, Managerial perceptions of corporate social disclosure: An Irish story Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal. ,vol. 15, pp. 406- 436 ,(2002) , 10.1108/09513570210435898