作者: Ruth Garside , Ken Stein , Katrina Wyatt , Ali Round
DOI: 10.1111/J.1471-0528.2005.00449.X
关键词: Balloon 、 Menstrual bleeding 、 Endometrial Ablation Techniques 、 Weather balloon 、 Adverse effect 、 Medicine 、 Cochrane Library 、 Ablation 、 Surgery 、 Endometrial ablation
摘要: Objective To compare the effectiveness of two second generation endometrial ablation techniques (microwave and thermal balloon ablation) with first to treat heavy menstrual bleeding in women. Search strategy We searched Cochrane Library (issue 3, 2002), National Research Register, MEDLINE (1966 August Embase (1980 2002) Web Science Proceedings (all years). also reference lists contacted experts manufacturers field. Selection criteria Randomised controlled trials microwave versus transcervical resection rollerball ablation, alone or combination, were included. Data collection analysis Two reviewers independently selected studies for inclusion extracted data. As there was considerable clinical methodological heterogeneity among studies, meta-analysis not undertaken results are presented descriptively. Results randomised eight (six trials) included review. No significant differences found between terms amenorrhoea, patterns, pre-menstrual symptoms, patient satisfaction quality life. Microwave had significantly shorter operating theatre times than techniques. Adverse effects few all techniques, but fewer peri-operative adverse techniques. Conclusion alternatives treating bleeding. head-to-head have been is yet enough evidence these