The influence of cross-sectional shape and surface area on the microtensile bond test

作者: Suwachai Phrukkanon , Michael F. Burrow , Martin J. Tyas

DOI: 10.1016/S0109-5641(98)00034-7

关键词: Stress (mechanics)Materials scienceEnamel paintDentinDental bondingUltimate tensile strengthBond strengthFracture toughnessAdhesiveComposite material

摘要: Abstract Objectives . The purpose of this study was to determine the effect cross-sectional area shape (cylindrical vs rectangular) and bonding surface on microtensile bond strengths stress distribution four dentin adhesive systems (Scotchbond MP Plus, OptiBond FL, Solo, One-Step). In addition, finite element analysis (FEA) models were developed investigate distributions. Methods Extracted human molars cut vertically occlusal enamel removed; one-half tooth used for rectangular specimens, other half cylindrical specimens. bonded according manufacturers' directions covered with a block resin composite. For shaped diamond bur lathe produce specimens 1.1, 1.5 or 3.1 mm 2 at interface. sectioned obtain bar-shaped which hour-glass same as round Bonds stressed in tension speed 1 mm min −1 mean compared using two-way ANOVA, one-way LSD Student's t tests. fractured surfaces examined by scanning electron microscopy, frequencies fracture modes Kruskal–Wallis Mann–Whitney U FEA created simulating areas distribution. Results groups showed significantly lower than 1.1 mm ( p exhibited failure interface between resin. No differences determined mode matched patterns calculated from modeling. Significance results indicate that test methods small higher those larger areas, has little effect. This is probably result fewer defects occurring small-area

参考文章(19)
Oilo G, Bond strength testing--what does it mean? International Dental Journal. ,vol. 43, pp. 492- 498 ,(1993)
Emmanuel E. Gdoutos, Fracture Mechanics: An Introduction ,(1993)
Sis Darendeliler Yaman, Tayfun Alaçam, Yavuz Yaman, Analysis of stress distribution in a maxillary central incisor subjected to various post and core applications Journal of Endodontics. ,vol. 24, pp. 107- 111 ,(1998) , 10.1016/S0099-2399(98)80087-3
L. Perinka, H. Sano, H. Hosoda, Dentin thickness, hardness, and Ca-concentration vs bond strength of dentin adhesives. Dental Materials. ,vol. 8, pp. 229- 233 ,(1992) , 10.1016/0109-5641(92)90090-Y
A. A. Griffith, The Phenomena of Rupture and Flow in Solids Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A. ,vol. 221, pp. 163- 198 ,(1921) , 10.1098/RSTA.1921.0006
C.L. DAVIDSON, A.I. ABDALLA, A.J. GEE, An investigation into the quality of dentine bonding systems for accomplishing a durable bond Journal of Oral Rehabilitation. ,vol. 20, pp. 291- 300 ,(1993) , 10.1111/J.1365-2842.1993.TB01611.X
L.E. Tam, R.M. Pilliar, Fracture Toughness of Dentin/Resin-composite Adhesive Interfaces Journal of Dental Research. ,vol. 72, pp. 953- 959 ,(1993) , 10.1177/00220345930720051801
Hidehiko Sano, Tsunekazu Shono, Hidekazu Sonoda, Toshio Takatsu, Bernard Ciucchi, Ricardo Carvalho, David H. Pashley, Relationship between surface area for adhesion and tensile bond strength — Evaluation of a micro-tensile bond test Dental Materials. ,vol. 10, pp. 236- 240 ,(1994) , 10.1016/0109-5641(94)90067-1
M. Nakajima, H. Sano, M.F. Burrow, J. Tagami, M. Yoshiyama, S. Ebisu, B. Ciucchi, C.M. Russell, D.H. Pashley, Tensile Bond Strength and SEM Evaluation of Caries-affected Dentin Using Dentin Adhesives Journal of Dental Research. ,vol. 74, pp. 1679- 1688 ,(1995) , 10.1177/00220345950740100901
R. Van Noort, G.E. Cardew, I.C. Howard, S. Noroozi, The Effect of Local Interfacial Geometry on the Measurement of the Tensile Bond Strength to Dentin Journal of Dental Research. ,vol. 70, pp. 889- 893 ,(1991) , 10.1177/00220345910700050501